Removing the burqa from our justice system

by Whaleoil on July 30, 2010 · 4 comments

A pedo restau­ran­teur has had his veil ripped from him by a judge.

Name Suppression

Name Sup­pres­sion is a Burqa for Justice

Judge Jane Far­ish has lifted what she called “the mask of respectabil­ity” from busi­ness­man, restau­ra­teur, and grand­fa­ther Gra­ham Dixon Cat­ley, jail­ing him from two years two months for inde­cent assaults on three boys decades ago.

Cat­ley is now aged 76 and has health prob­lems includ­ing depres­sion, but one of his vic­tims said in court that he had been regarded as a pil­lar of society.

He has been pro­tected all these years by his money, his lawyers, and his pow­er­ful busi­ness asso­ciates,” the vic­tim said at Catley’s sen­tenc­ing in the Christchurch Dis­trict Court today.

Two of the boys – now adult men – read their vic­tim impact state­ments at the sen­tenc­ing ses­sion, and the third was read on the man’s behalf by crown pros­e­cu­tor Anne Toohey. The mother of two of the abused boys also read her statement.

The vic­tims asked the court to lift Catley’s name sup­pres­sion. “It would be the biggest injus­tice of all if name sup­pres­sion was to con­tinue,” said the mother.

They also opposed him being granted home deten­tion, but Judge Far­ish said she would have ruled out home deten­tion sen­tence even if Cat­ley was within the two-year prison range where it could be considered.

Name Sup­pres­sion is like the burqa for open jus­tice. We don’t tol­er­ate the wear­ing of it here, so why should we tol­er­ate the wear­ing of a burqa over our jus­tice sys­tem. Name Sup­pres­sion is eas­ily acces­si­ble to the wealthy, the con­nected, the famous, and the estab­lish­ment. They hide under that burqa to pro­vide a mask of respectabil­ity and behind the burqa of their vic­tims pain and suffering.

The time is nigh for the end to name sup­pres­sion in New Zealand.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Related Posts:

{ 4 comments }

inventory2 July 30, 2010 at 2:58 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Name Sup­pres­sion is like the burqa for open justice.

An excel­lent anal­ogy Cam. It sounds as though you might be prepar­ing the ground for your defence, and it could be an excel­lent rallying-call given the moves to ban burqas in Europe.

robf July 30, 2010 at 3:50 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Pity it takes a plea from the vic­tims to lift name sup­pres­sion. Name sup­pres­sion is an injus­tice in itself. Is it pos­si­ble we have a Judge here wor­thy of the Title?

Agent BallSack July 30, 2010 at 4:14 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Notice it was a female Judge? NOT part of the old boys net­work that have been pro­tect­ing this pedo for years…In fact I betya shes now black balled for nam­ing and sham­ing him. Could be a good name to know Whale, get the judi­ciary that cares behind you.

jman July 30, 2010 at 11:41 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I won­der if you’re aware that out­spo­ken Aus­tralian broad­caster Der­rin Hinch is cur­rently wag­ing a sim­i­lar cam­paign in Aus­tralia. He had to go to court today to defend him­self against breach­ing name sup­pres­sion laws for nam­ing a child rapist.

http://www.hinch.net/name-them-shame-them/name-them-shame-them-rally.html

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: