Lawyer asks for my arrest for contempt

by Whaleoil on May 21, 2010 · 22 comments

Mike Antunovic the lawyer for of Welling­ton Dis­trict Com­man­der Super­in­ten­dent Pieri Munro charged with assault­ing his son today applied to the judge to have me charged with con­tempt and for an arrest war­rant to be issued.

The Judge report­edly (from my spies sit­ting in court) rolled his eyes and asked Mr Antunovic is he wanted to spend the rest of the day argu­ing a con­tempt case or get on with deal­ing with his clients case. Clearly at this point in time the judge has pre­vailed, though I expect I can’t be far off being picked up for this.

One really shouldn’t upset the estab­lish­ment, espe­cially when they are Police, judges, lawyers and the Solicitor-General.

This trial is really look­ing like a case of hush for the boys. Sup­pres­sion avail­able for the guardians of the sys­tem. What ever hap­pened to an open jus­tice sys­tem. It is now a sys­tem for the boys and the famous.

I don’t really think the Solicitor-General under­stands the pub­lic­ity hell that would unleash upon him should I be arrested and jailed.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Related Posts:

{ 22 comments }

thinker May 21, 2010 at 4:00 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 6

The Good Oil! Go for it, give ‘em heaps.

Fiscally Conservative Kiwi May 21, 2010 at 4:32 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

Heh, I went to school with his son.

jonno May 21, 2010 at 4:41 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 7

I, too, salute you.

There used to be a phrase “jus­tice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done.”

Damn sight lit­tle of either in this banana republic.

inventory2 May 21, 2010 at 6:26 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 7

Kia kaha Cam. Don’t let the bas­tards grind you down.

spanishbride May 21, 2010 at 6:29 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 5

I just don’t ‘ get ‘ this shut­ting the gate after the horse has bolted. His name was pub­lished by no less than two news­pa­pers. How can he now be granted name suppression?

titanuranus May 21, 2010 at 6:36 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 6

Because SB ‚NZs legal sys­tem is fucked beyond repair,it is only there to help lawyers get rich,not to pro­vide jus­tice to the the cit­i­zens of this country.

toby May 21, 2010 at 7:03 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 4

So sup­pos­ing you get arrested, what then? Pre­sum­ably you can post bail and get out? Or can you not just pay for bail in NZ? And what hap­pens if you men­tion some inter­est­ing names while on bail or link to a news­pa­per arti­cle which names a per­son? I sup­pose the lawyer would just wee his pants then.

megashitstirrer May 21, 2010 at 7:06 pm

Poorly-rated. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 26

Hid­den due to low com­ment rat­ing. Click here to see.

jimmie May 21, 2010 at 7:16 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 8

piss off troll go back to the standard

ummmm May 21, 2010 at 7:48 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

Mean­while in the Moth­er­land the Tories have other ideas…
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7132498.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797084

nasska May 21, 2010 at 8:03 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4

Go hard Cam! Whether you per­son­ally win or lose the issue is not going to die.

Jack May 21, 2010 at 8:28 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 5

Gid­day

Of course you should be arrested for con­temp of the cpourt. So should every other think­ing man in the bloody coun­try cos the bloody court is conteptible.

megashitstirrer May 21, 2010 at 8:43 pm

Poorly-rated. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 16

Hid­den due to low com­ment rat­ing. Click here to see.

paulmarsden May 21, 2010 at 8:45 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4

I don’t think Michael is the brigh­est of lawyers and in my view, is hardly an adver­sary in the court­room. Inter­est­ing that his team failed mis­er­ably in argu­ing against cor­rupt, Crown pros­e­cuters and a sick, old and bias judge (who had no busi­ness been on the bench), in R vs Watson.

kehua May 21, 2010 at 9:04 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 4

You know the score Cam, let us know when and where and we can organ­ise a whanau sup­port group.

cadwallader May 22, 2010 at 8:16 am

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 6

Good luck to you Whale.

If you are ever for­mally charged and the mat­ter goes to Court the pub­lic debate will be intense. How­ever within the Law Pro­fes­sion the debate will be espe­cially vibrant I suspect.

The prob­lem with non-disclosure of iden­tity is that it does not achieve what it is intended to do. The ratio­nale of non-disclosure is to achieve a ver­dict untainted by pub­lic opin­ion and, should an accused be found not guilty, to allow that accused to carry on with life unaf­fected. These may be ten­able aims in a larger com­mu­nity but here in NZ our pop­u­la­tion is scarcely greater than a mid-size city in other coun­tries. The notion of any­one fac­ing charges with­out his/her iden­tity becom­ing known to a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of the com­mu­nity is futile. You are not dam­ag­ing any­one or any­thing by releas­ing details.

blondo May 22, 2010 at 10:52 am

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 6

Good luck Cameron, you know my views on name sup­pres­sion The N.Z judi­cial sys­tem is set up to pro­tect the crims and not the vic­tims. My exhus­band got name sup­pres­sion when con­victed for fraud last year…the judge gave him this with­out seek­ing my views on the mat­ter there­fore breach­ing my rights as a victim.Simon Power wrote to me and said I should get a lawyer to over­turn this, why should I have to pay for one of those snakes to use the court as a fur­ther ride on the gravy train…I would rather pay the $1000 fine or go to jail for breach­ing the name sup­pres­sion order. Where is the best place for me to pub­lish his name?

Whaleoil May 22, 2010 at 11:01 am

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 3

Right here, send me your story and I will pub­lish it, also send me links to news items at the time. email is in the con­tact page.

dorkusjuice May 22, 2010 at 12:23 pm

Poorly-rated. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 19

Hid­den due to low com­ment rat­ing. Click here to see.

titanuranus May 22, 2010 at 1:28 pm

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 5

Prob­a­bly need to change your name to fuckwitjuice.

While you are at it maybe explain why arse­holes should get the pro­tec­tion not afforded to their vic­tims or the rest of the law-abiding cit­i­zenry of this country.

dorkusjuice May 23, 2010 at 11:26 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2

fuck­witjuice– i love it, very witty titan­ic­sphinc­ter, or is that wha­le­oil? a bit sad isn’t it log­ging on to your own blog under dif­fer­ent psue­donyms? I’m more con­cerned with the favourable treat­ment given to your rich mates when it comes to sen­tenc­ing, most recent exam­ple being Mark Bryers.

cloudwalker May 24, 2010 at 6:20 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4

Tell bet­ter work stories,how to get away with rape,killing inno­cent bystanders,beating your wife,beating your kids,drunken driving,having your dogs attack­ing inno­cent people,charge the vic­tim and let the per­pe­tra­tor go,let the vic­tim bleed to death and then get promoted,shoot peo­ple play­ing golf,forget child abuse chase fine defaulters,jion today

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: