Keep Digging Charlie

by Whaleoil on March 17, 2010 · 10 comments

Char­lie Shovel really has no shame and his behav­iour speaks vol­umes about why Labour is out of gov­ern­ment. Some­how they think because the mes­sen­ger is an ACT sup­porter it dimin­ishes his behav­iour. I doubt that the media and Char­lie Shovel are cor­rect when they say the kids were scream­ing. He even admit­ted on Break­fast this morn­ing that the kid sit­ting next to BTP was quiet, so now we are down to two kids pos­si­bly scream­ing, one was 3 y.o. and the other 1 y.o. His story is com­plete bullshit.

Watch this video of Gladys this morn­ing on Break­fast, then watch it again with the sound turned down. Any­one with even a basic under­stand­ing of body lan­guage knows this man is lying. He dis­plays all the clas­sic traits of a liar, but as a politi­cian he should have learned to hide most of them by now. He is hopeless.

I feel sorry for Gladys he has lost his chance at the big time. He was regarded as one of the most tal­ented Labour peo­ple, in a tal­ent pool as deep as a carpark pud­dle, he was alleged to good under­stand­ing of busi­ness hav­ing actu­ally earnt a crust not being a trougher and hard work­ing. Instead of apol­o­gis­ing and keep­ing his long-term lead­er­ship ambi­tions alive he decided to get all pious, nasty and typ­i­cal born to rule social­ist trougher. If he had sim­ply apol­o­gised on Sun­day night this story would have gone away. It is dis­ap­point­ing he has fallen over so badly in a way so out of touch with NZ, as much as Labour are scum, one day in the dis­tant future they will run the coun­try and we need guys like Gladys hav­ing influ­ence rather than a bunch of union bludgers and teach­ers run­ning the show. Mean­while his felch­ing friends and paid lap-bloggers have said that he is a father too. Well I’m sorry have a spank into a turkey baster does not a par­ent make. Sperm donor yes, but a father or par­ent, no. Watch the video.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 8% [?]

Related Posts:

Tagged as: • • • •

{ 9 comments }

marybelle March 17, 2010 at 11:27 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3

Char­lie why don’t you admit it? What you really thought was that what the noisy kids really needed was a short, sharp whack! Say­ing “shut up” to kids doesn’t do any good. Inter­est­ing that Chris Fin­layson has also come out in sup­port for Char­lie. Those who bat for the other team have lit­tle under­stand­ing of what par­ent­ing is all about – yet they are keen to tell us on the other side how to bring our kids up. They should just SHUT UP! Who are the ones on the flight who called Char­lie in sup­port? Let’s hear from you.

hagues March 17, 2010 at 11:30 am

Well-loved. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3

I love Paul Henry’s com­ment at the end where he basi­cally says ‘thanks for com­ing on the show, but I still think you are lying’ lol.

axeman March 17, 2010 at 1:33 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 5

From the Toomucky blog:
“Main­stream Media get story ideas from Hate Speech right wing blogs”
‘The Stan­dard notes some­thing I’ve picked up on recently, the under­funded news rooms of the main­stream media staffed by grad­u­ates now look to right wing blogs for news sto­ries. This noth­ing story about Charles Chau­vel came from an ACT party hate speech site and fol­lows a trend. Yes­ter­day Wha­le­oil dis­gust­ingly claimed Chris Carter’s dead mother was receiv­ing phone perks while Cam referred to Carter as a gay pig. This fol­lows another bull­shit story regard­ing Carter and a ferry ride vom­ited up on Kiwiblogh (sic) by David Far­rar who seems to have ducked any real scrutiny of his role in the leaked Don Brash printed email story’

Com­ments from that gut­less prick Brad­bury who only yes­ter­day was refer­ring to you as “Cam” and “buddy” (and why not Fel­low Blog­ger?)
His obses­sion with a right wing con­spir­acy per­pet­u­ated by the nasty right wing hate groups knows no bounds.

garry March 17, 2010 at 2:26 pm

Poorly-rated. Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 7

Hid­den due to low com­ment rat­ing. Click here to see.

adze March 17, 2010 at 6:24 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

“Any­one with even a basic under­stand­ing of body lan­guage knows this man is lying.”

Which ges­ture, or clus­ter of ges­tures sug­gest to you he was lying, out of interest?

michaele March 17, 2010 at 7:22 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

How lack­ing in life expe­ri­ence Char­lie is. One year olds don’t have the dex­ter­ity for a colour­ing in book, three year olds don’t have the motor skills to keep in the lines.

The last time I flew with the kids was a 90 minute flight to Dunedin and back on the same day for a funeral. We had snacks and toys to keep the kids amused, but that didn’t stop them from mak­ing noise from time to time.

scanner March 17, 2010 at 7:59 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Chucky your fucked, every time you open your mouth it seems to be to change feet.
This sort of crap would never have seen the light of day if H2 had still been around, Chucky would have had his bum smacked and sent off to bed with­out any pud­ding.
How ironic he slags off the dreaded right wing blog­ger yet he hails from the polit­i­cal party that invented char­ac­ter assas­si­na­tion and made shit­ting on any­one who stood in their way an art form.
Time to nom­i­nate Chuck Shovel as the “Feltcher of the Year”.

wallyanchor March 18, 2010 at 12:24 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Go Paul Henry!
I agree with hagues above, that’s exactly what he was saying.

jonno March 18, 2010 at 5:50 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

A wider ques­tion this sit­u­a­tion begs, is why exactly is the labout party rid­dled with chutney-ferrets? If cocoa-shunters are 2 or 3% of the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion, then why are they 30% of the labour party MPs? I mean does the party attract them, or does it turn peo­ple that way?

(Cam’s turkey baster com­ment obvi­ously got me thinking)

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: