SSBmZWVsIHNvcnJ5IGZvciB0aGUgb3RoZXJz

by Whaleoil on January 11, 2010 · 115 comments

00110100 00111001 00100000 00110110 00110001 00100000 00110110 01100101 00100000 00110010 00110000 00100000 00110100 00110101 00100000 00110111 00110111 00100000 00110110 00110101 00100000 00110110 01100101 00100000 00110010 01100100 00100000 00110101 00110011 00100000 00110111 00110100 00100000 00110111 00110010 00100000 00110110 00110101 00100000 00110110 00110101 00100000 00110111 00110100

Pop­u­lar­ity: 100% [?]

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

{ 114 comments }

Kandco January 11, 2010 at 10:36 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Well I think its hilar­i­ous he’s being called a celebrity! LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL. Has any­one heard of him before?

Don January 11, 2010 at 11:16 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

What is it with the National Party and perverts?

egdeacution January 12, 2010 at 12:33 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

lol I’ve never heard of him!

The Gantt Guy January 12, 2010 at 1:36 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Whale, I don’t know why peo­ple are talk­ing about the name sup­pres­sion case in con­junc­tion with this post. I’m laid up with pneu­mo­nia at the moment and in my rare moments of lucid­ity, decided to write a decoder rather than con­tinue to drive SWMBO and SWMBO-junior bonkers. I’ve cracked the code, and it doesn’t men­tion any­thing about a court case or charges or name suppression.

As an aside, I already knew the name of the ex-MP by fol­low­ing the mas­sive trail left by the HoS. I would imag­ine Car­o­line Meng-Yee is ner­vously await­ing a visit from the con­stab­u­lary for her breach­ing of the sup­pres­sion order?

Also, the ex-MP is such a nobody his wikipedia page doesn’t even include a ref­er­ence to the charges (unlike the “Olympian” and the “Enter­tainer” – AFAIK the “Come­dian” is even more of a nobody – he has no wikipedia entry).

The_Grizz January 12, 2010 at 8:02 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Look in the page his­tory. I will not link it here in case I get a knock on the door by the boys in blue.

Steve January 12, 2010 at 1:39 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Inno­cent until proven guilty etc…Had fun with the code though. Never heard of him. Promi­nent my ass.

tromboni January 12, 2010 at 4:57 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

got it! never heard of him though

Guest January 12, 2010 at 6:30 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I used a good trans­la­tor at http://home2.paulschou.net/tools/xlate/

This per­son is a nobody. Why hide his name. I googled this per­son and have never heard of this person

Guest January 12, 2010 at 7:14 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I didn’t know Michael Moore even had a blog…

Any­ways, I googled your site, gave you a hit for your counter. Grats.

Bril­liant tho, any­one who is accused of any crime, no mat­ter how awful…should be paraded through the media accord­ing to your sen­si­ble self-serving phi­los­o­phy! Because we know how even-handed they are.
You’re an attention-seeking headline-grabbing idiot, who has no respect for pri­vacy of vic­tims, OR ‘alleged’ people.

hobbsnz January 12, 2010 at 7:34 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

That was fun! never heard of him. If it wasn’t for the national media call­ing him a promi­nent NZer I wouldn’t have both­ered find­ing out who it was.

wiki rocks January 12, 2010 at 7:38 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

In a cert­ian some­ones wiki his­tory (not the cur­rent pub­lished ver­sion) it says “In Jan­u­ary 2010, XXXX-XXXXXX appeared in court charged with inde­cently assault­ing a 13-year-old girl

BOB January 12, 2010 at 8:46 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Hope your time inside teaches you some lessons on pride, humil­ity and law. Enjoy the food, night screams and black cock. Tit

Whaleoil January 12, 2010 at 8:40 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Love the cock, love it.

ners January 12, 2010 at 9:37 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Never heard of the guy, and I agree that name sup­pres­sion is overused in this coun­try.
For if or when you get fined: just open a bank account, post the details here, and am sure the many sup­port­ers here will help pick up the tab.
Keep up the good work, some­one has to!

frumiousfrog January 12, 2010 at 9:07 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I’m sure that these arrange­ments of dig­its are here for artis­tic pur­poses only, and very nice they are too. Appar­ently if a par­tic­u­lar encod­ing scheme is applied then they can be con­verted into the name of an indi­vid­ual. Then again, with an appro­pri­ate encod­ing scheme they could be con­verted into any­thing. If an infer­ence is made that the (arguably) named indi­vid­ual is asso­ci­ated with some wrong­do­ing then it is who­ever makes the infer­ence, not the provider of the data, that should be held respon­si­ble for any alle­ga­tions that ensue.

That aside, the author might be aware that a trial-by-media might ensue (I don’t pre­sume to know any­thing about his motives), but if so then he is clearly happy to eat his own dog food, which is laudable.

If you should find your­self in need of an expert wit­ness you know where to come, Whale ;-)

Shady January 12, 2010 at 10:49 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Glad I worked your code out.
Now I know that the only other per­son who fits the newspaper’s descrip­tion is inno­cent. So it is still ok to buy his jewellery .

meme January 13, 2010 at 12:52 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I totally agree with WO on this one and I thank him for his stand. Either every­body gets name sup­pres­sion or no one should. It’s really that sim­ple and our laws need to be changed.
Per­son­ally, I’d like to see name sup­pres­sion apply for every­one until they have been found guilty in court. We are all inno­cent until proven guilty in this coun­try, right? So why not give every­one the same rights and not just pro­tect the rich or ‘so called’ famous?
Use some imag­i­na­tion and put your­self in some­one elses shoes. Imag­ine you’ve been charged with a seri­ous crime and released or found inno­cent in court. Every prospec­tive employer or co-worker can goolge these days. Do you think you’d get the next job?
Alter­na­tively put your­self in the employ­ers shoes: You have a new can­di­date who you dis­cover on google was charged but released for some­thing really nasty like sex crimes. Would you employ them even though they have been found inno­cent or the police plain cocked up and charged the wrong guy?
The Police make mis­takes every sin­gle day, after all they are mostly human. My point is that false accu­sa­tions or charges stick and can ruin lives. We need total name sup­pres­sion for every­one, why should just the so called ‘famous’ or rich peo­ple get name sup­pres­sion? Surely every­one deserves it or no one does.

Grant Michael McKenna January 12, 2010 at 9:53 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Prime News had a brief pic­ture of your Face­book page– with­out being logged in– and showed two of your FB friends– and I am one of them! Already been con­grat­u­lated twice! Fame at last!

zasalemel January 12, 2010 at 10:05 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

i feel sorry for the oth­ers is what the title say

Guest January 13, 2010 at 12:09 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

The ex-MP con­cerned still has an auc­tion run­ning on Trade Me. Does that count as an online source pub­lish­ing his name (and con­tact details)?

Harpoon January 13, 2010 at 1:33 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Why all the code silly busi­ness? Why not just write the names, if it’s your con­vic­tion to do so?

Harpoon January 13, 2010 at 2:06 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

No pun intended.

Spanish Bride January 13, 2010 at 2:27 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Is-blogger-Cameron-Wha...

Pub­lic opin­ion is clearly shown here. Take a peek

Zarchoff January 13, 2010 at 2:28 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Is he still a National figure?

Billy January 14, 2010 at 7:03 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Im con­fused…………. I thought the per­son was meant to be in his 30’s?? He aint that young!! Cor­rect me if im wrong.

Decoder January 14, 2010 at 11:58 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Green turned National turned Fiddler

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: