Rodney looks for the source data because Nick won’t

by Whaleoil on November 27, 2009 · 18 comments

Rod­ney Hide has done what Nick Smith has failed to do and ask for ALL the details of the data at NIWA so we can see if they are cheat­ing us or not. Why is it up to the only hon­est politi­cian to get the sci­en­tists to come clean on why data needs to be manip­u­lated at all, which data was manip­u­lated and the exact rea­sons why it was?

These are all valid rea­sons, espe­cially no that we have an ETS sys­tem that will crip­ple our econ­omy if main­tained. If the sci­ence is bogus then the ETS and asso­ci­ated bull­shit that goes with it be tossed out and then the pros­e­cu­tions can begin for the great­est fraud attempted to com­mit­ted on the global pop­u­la­tion in the his­tory of mankind.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Related Posts:

{ 15 comments }

erikter November 27, 2009 at 6:17 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Why is the rank and file of the National Party, includ­ing you Cameron, not exert­ing pres­sure on Key to take a stronger stance on this mat­ter? Why is the PM so detached from the issue?

It seems Nick Smith can get away with mur­der and his boss and cow­ard party mem­bers will say / do noth­ing to stop him.

Is this the National Party you voted for?

anon November 27, 2009 at 6:38 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

No, I think Whale has been on it from the begin­ning. As for his portly lit­tle mate who’s busy tak­ing hol­i­day snaps around the mid­dle east – that’s another matter.

Chiefsfan73 November 27, 2009 at 7:13 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Spot on, it aint the nats I voted for. Weak as piss the lot of them (Crusher excepted).

PK:) November 27, 2009 at 7:49 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

It’s strangely ironic how much the present sit­u­a­tion in rela­tion to global warm­ing and the atten­dant media cov­er­age it is receiv­ing reminds me of the lead up to Y2K. In that instance because I knew noth­ing about micro proces­sors and run­ning any win­dows oper­at­ing sys­tem was the cause of so much grief on a daily basis I got sucked in by the Y2Kers and was sure that apart from any Apple com­puter, net­works were doomed to shut down world wide unless of course you had made the nec­es­sary invest­ment in Y2K com­pli­ant software.

Now all you should need to do is replace the word soft­ware with car­bon and it’s Y2K all over again, correct???

Lucy November 27, 2009 at 10:56 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Yep!

Bosco November 27, 2009 at 8:17 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Rofl, Rod­ney whose cor­rupt lit­tle snout is so far in the pub­lic feed is not even funny anymore?

Maybe he needs to go on another ‘fact find­ing’ mis­sion with his part­ner to dis­cover the truth!

billhicks November 27, 2009 at 8:26 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

If we look back on the fraud of global gore shit/climate fraud in 20 years our grand­chil­dren will laugh,as we laughed when peo­ple thought “Duck and cover” under there school desks would have saved them from a nuclear bomb………

mediatart November 27, 2009 at 7:16 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

THis is the key to the cli­mate change , for­get the frogs in Costa Rica or the coral in Botswana. Con­cen­trate on the tem­per­a­ture records, with the orig­i­nal data . And then get top notch sta­tis­ti­cian, not these ‘cli­mate sci­en­tists’ with there own shonky pro­grams, to analyse the results.

They will fight like cor­nered cats to stop this hap­pen­ing, since they know their cred­i­bil­ity and careers will go down the tubes when they are prop­erly reviewed.

I would love to have the whole car­bon tax or ETS thing, It suits me down to the ground . But call me old fash­ioned but fid­dling the num­bers to get the warm­ing doesnt impress me. And now tak­ing from the poor to give to selected well off groups doesnt impress me either

Dave Mann November 27, 2009 at 8:04 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

This crazy ETS scheme WILL be main­tained now. No gov­ern­ment will be able to change a thing because now that the maoris are involved, there would be all kinds of hell break loose if EVER a change were con­tem­plated. If any­body even pro­posed chang­ing the ETS in the future I can hear the agrieved cries of ‘white man’s rip-off’, ‘we have been dis­ad­van­taged’, ‘bro­ken promises’, hon­our the treaty’ etc etc blah blah moan moan etc etc blah blah moan moanetc etc blah blah moan moanetc etc blah blah moan moanetc etc blah blah moan moan

mediatart November 27, 2009 at 8:20 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Even Google is get­ting in on the cen­sor­ship
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012721.h...

Cli­mate Emails: Don’t Google It
The Google search func­tion comes with a handy helper. Typ­i­cally, when you begin to type in search terms, a drop down win­dow will appear to pro­vide help­ful sug­ges­tions, based on the search terms Google users are typ­ing in most often.

I men­tion this, because a cou­ple of days ago, typ­ing the word “cli­mate” into the win­dow resulted in “cli­mate hack” and “cli­mate emails” pop­ping up near the top of the handy helper sug­ges­tion list.

Today, Google’s handy helper seems to have had a change of heart.

Try for yourselves.

Put in google.co.nz ” Cli­mate” and see the sug­ges­tions and then put –h then –a then –c then-k You have to give the whole word “hack” to get any hits. Yet “Cli­mate Hawkes Bay” pops up amoung others

Chiefsfan73 November 27, 2009 at 9:35 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

same at google.com.au mother f@#kers

Dave Moore November 27, 2009 at 9:16 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

For any­one truly inter­ested in this sub­ject (rather than just slag­ging off Rod­ney) check out what the Cli­mate Sci­ence Coali­tion has dis­cov­ered about NIWA and, in par­tic­u­lar, Jim Salingers data. Here is the link http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_... Check out the pdf file it shows some very inter­est­ing “adjust­ment” of the data. Per­haps NIWA or Jim might like to tell us why it was “manipulated”.

Dave Moore November 27, 2009 at 9:17 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Here is that link again http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_...

Akldnut November 29, 2009 at 3:01 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Why is it up to the only hon­est politi­cian to get the sci­en­tists to come clean”

That must be a joke whale – aint no hon­est politi­cians around here

Ayrdale November 30, 2009 at 2:21 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

They will fight like cor­nered cats to stop this hap­pen­ing, since they know their cred­i­bil­ity and careers will go down the tubes when they are prop­erly reviewed…”

We have to look at this on a longer time scale too.

What­ever these jun­ket lov­ing clowns decide to do with our money in Copen­hagen, what­ever stitched up shonky deal is made, the ver­dict of his­tory and of sci­ence will remain the same; cli­mate alarmists are frauds, and their stooges within the sci­ence estab­lish­ments and in the media are guilty of col­lu­sion, lies and deceit. The infor­ma­tion is now released, and the stink and shame of cor­rup­tion will fol­low those who wil­fully choose to ignore it.

This let­ter from Rod­ney is excel­lent, but it’s a lit­tle late and I hate to say, only because his hand has been forced. Rod­ney stated quite openly last year that cat­a­strophic global warm­ing was bunkum. His resis­tance to it now is wel­come, but some­what belated.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: