Why Hanover investors will get nothing from Hotchin and Watson

by Whaleoil on November 23, 2009 · 9 comments

For the ter­mi­nally stu­pid investors of Hanover Finance who last year voted in favour of a mora­to­rium on the promise that they would get 100 cents in the dol­lar back on their invest­ments here is a lit­tle les­son that will explain pre­cisely why the mora­to­rium was sought and why you are dumber than a sack of hammers.

The stage man­aged mora­to­rium play wasn’t for the ben­e­fit of the investors, it was purely for the ben­e­fit of Mark Hotchin and  Eric Wat­son so they could avoid pros­e­cu­tion. It seems that only Dun­can Bridg­man at the NBR has realised this;

Last Decem­ber, Hanover’s 13,800 investors voted to allow the com­pany to con­tinue oper­at­ing under a mora­to­rium promis­ing a drip-feed of their money over five years.
The deal meant Hanover would escape receiver­ship and investors lost their right to sue the direc­tors per­son­ally for any short­fall from sale of prop­er­ties.
Secured investors were owed $462.5 mil­lion; while its main sub­sidiary United Finance has 2575 secured depos­i­tors owed $64.7 mil­lion.
Spar­ing the gory details (the num­bers are not yet avail­able) Hanover said yes­ter­day that a “rapid dete­ri­o­ra­tion” in the com­mer­cial prop­erty mar­ket and IFRS require­ments had impacted heav­ily on the company’s result for the year to June 2009.

What! I hear you say. Well there is a two year time period on seek­ing to “get” Direc­tors and recover inap­pro­pri­ately allo­cated Direc­tors Fees and that time period is now passed thanks mainly to the mora­to­rium. If the com­pany had been put into receiver­ship a year ago on the advice of many but mainly Bruce Shep­pard then Hotchin and Wat­son may well have been pur­sued by the receivers to recover monies.

That will not hap­pen now and Wat­son and Hotchin will most likely stitch up a cosy deal that makes sure they get paid for their share­hold­ing in cash from Allied Farm­ers and that the investors roll the dice and take shares in the new com­pany in the hope that they can sell and recoup their money. Any fool, though per­haps not the Hanover investors can see that there will be many more sell­ers than buy­ers and the like­li­hood of get­ting even 20c in the dol­lar remains remote. Even more likely is that Wat­son and Hotchin with their great wads of cash will buy up those impov­er­ished investors share­hold­ings and be back in con­trol within 24 hours of bail­ing out.

And to be per­fectly hon­est I have lit­tle sym­pa­thy for the investors, they had the oppor­tu­nity to realise as least some­thing but they choked and voted for the mora­to­rium. They now suf­fer their loss at their own hands rather than at the hands of Eric Wat­son and Mark Hotchin.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 9% [?]

Related Posts:

{ 8 comments }

Grant Michael McKenna November 23, 2009 at 4:54 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Mom & pop investors are mas­tur­ba­tors, because they sure screwed themselves.

mediatart November 23, 2009 at 5:17 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Eric Wat­son , wasnt he the one with the brand new Boe­ing BBJ ( 737) per­sonal jet. Traded up from a Global Express.
Some­thing has to pay for the tyres

wlf November 23, 2009 at 10:36 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

No, that is Graeme Hart.

dog on it November 23, 2009 at 5:50 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

quite for­ward thinkng though of Marky boy to include a ‘present wrap­ping room’ in his 50mil bunker – it’ll give his wife some­thing to do – wrap­ping 13,000 food parcels every Xmas with a thank you card attached for all the silly old fools/ investors who paid for it….

Halley November 23, 2009 at 10:04 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Bruce Shep­pard from the NZ Share­hold­ers Asso­ci­a­tion http://www.nzshareholders.co.nz/
picked this a year ago – genius!

Fur­ther­more, in vot­ing down receiver­ship investors had for­gone an oppor­tu­nity to chase some $86 mil­lion in div­i­dend pay­ments Hanover paid its own­ers ahead of the company’s collapse.”

From Shep­pard labels Hanover investors ‘stu­pid lunatics’
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/756282

rhourdc November 24, 2009 at 12:20 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

v5mpaM uprvagv­o­less, [url=http://grvpkytyfokj.com/]grvpkytyfokj[/url], [link=http://ovfmdgvaoawb.com/]ovfmdgvaoawb[/link], http://grtllwlybymo.com/

peterwn November 23, 2009 at 6:48 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I guessed yes­ter­day that Hotchin would be suing hell Pizza over that bill­board and it seems i am right. What really sticks up the craw is he is using mom and pop investors’ money to mount his law­suit. This is thor­oughly abu­sive – the alleged defama­tion is aimed at him per­son­ally, not Hanover as a cor­po­rate entity, so why should the mom and pop investors have to pick up the tab.

Another thing, such defama­tion actions do not seem to achieve their over­all pur­pose, even if ‘tech­ni­cally’ suc­cess­ful. Just ask the aver­age UK or even NZ chirprac­tor fol­low­ing their respec­tive asso­ci­a­tions tak­ing (or attempt­ing) action against Simon Singh (a promi­nent UK sci­en­tific writer / jour­nal­ist) and the NZ Med­ical Asso­ci­a­tion (re use of ‘doc­tor’) respectively.

gangangaguinga November 24, 2009 at 8:23 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

[url=“http://www.soulpitchhustle.com/2009_10_29_acomplia.html”]acomplia[/url] http://www.soulpitchhustle.com/2009_10_29_acomplia.html acom­plia imiv [url=“http://www.soulpitchhustle.com/2009_10_29_propecia.html”]buy propecia[/url] buy prope­cia http://www.soulpitchhustle.com/2009_10_29_propecia.html bkrho

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: