Is Nick Smith corrupt?

by Whaleoil on November 22, 2009 · 12 comments

I ask because The Whale’s spies have been furi­ously send­ing doc­u­ments to the tipline today about a scan­dal that could only be described as “Free flights for ETS votes”

Nick Smith has been roundly con­demned by Fran O’Sullivan and even by his friend Rod Oram over the week­end for his mad and point­less rush to ram through his ETS under urgency this week. This is now espe­cially crazy inlight of the emerg­ing scan­dal amongst the sci­en­tists who have col­luded to lie to the world about Global Warming.

To do that, as Fran and Oram note, he needs the Maori Party.

There have been leaks all week about $100 bil­lion woman Sacha McMeek­ing want­ing a cool $2 bil­lion of car­bon cred­its for her iwi in exchange for telling the Maori Party they must sup­port Mad Nick, but Whaleoil’s spies close to the nego­ti­a­tions between National and Maori say it is even more venal than that.

Last week, McMeeking’s Iwi Lead­er­ship Group sug­gested that it and kau­matua should hence­forth accom­pany Cli­mate Change Nego­ti­a­tions Min­is­ter Tim Groser on all his over­seas trips, start­ing with the big Copen­hagen con­fer­ence next month.

The deal was “pay for our air­fares and hotel rooms, and for our grand­dads, and we’ll tell our client party, the Maori Party, to give its votes to you.” Whaleoil’s spies in the nego­ti­a­tion room say it was a bot­tom line.

And whad­dya think Nick Smith said?

Get fucked.  We’ve had Hone in Paris already this year and we cam­paigned against Labour send­ing kau­matua all around the world to pick up heads as so forth”????

No!

He wrote back essen­tially say­ing “no prob, bro”.

In his for­mal response to the McMeek­ing group, dated Thurs­day, he said: “I would wel­come the assis­tance of ILG del­e­gates – and kau­matua – at Copen­hagen and sub­se­quent meetings.”

Prob­lem is, Smith’s not even going to Copen­hagen.  It’s Groser who’ll have to look after the elderly kapa haka group.

Copen­hagen is a dead duck. Firstly it was winged by the fail­ure of politi­cians to get any con­sen­sus before hand and sec­ondly it was shot dead by the leaks of 1000′s of emails show­ing that the main sci­en­tists behind the major­ity of data sup­port­ing the lie that is Cli­mate Change and Global Warm­ing have lied and been lying to us for decades.

If were not bad enough that the Maori Party has pros­ti­tuted itself in the inter­ests of a select few of the elite maori­toc­racy but they also wanted to indulge in a bit of state funded trough­ing as well. As a mate of mine says, they wanted to “live it up on the large”.

If the con­tents of the doc­u­ments received via the tipline are real then Nick Smith must resign. I will pub­lish those doc­u­ments tomor­row morning.

In addi­tion there is sim­ply no need to rush this leg­is­la­tion, no need for it in the first place and real cause to stop and have a “cup of tea” to review the fall out from the destruc­tion of the rep­u­ta­tion of the lead­ing sci­en­tists sup­port­ing Global Warming.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

{ 11 comments }

Chiefsfan73 November 22, 2009 at 4:37 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

and now for the MSM, noth­ing to see hear move along response. sorry NZ, you’re F@#ked

Dimmocrazy November 22, 2009 at 4:24 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Good on ye Whale, expose, expose, expose

billhicks November 22, 2009 at 5:30 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Not only should he be sacked an inves­ti­ga­tion on who leaked the emails that led to Dr don brash who was knifed in the back…..As fox New says………..“Some peo­ple say”…by some­one who liked emails then but wont like them soon,some peo­ple say….

Chiefsfan73 November 22, 2009 at 5:52 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

If all this ETS stuff is so crit­i­cal to the “National Inter­est” as Penny Wong (Fed­eral Min­is­ter for Cli­mate Change here in Oz), is so fond of pro­claim­ing it is, then why has there been such scant pub­lic debate? Why has there been a refusal to table evi­dence, other than mod­els, to prove we need to act?

The pub­lic have not been in uproar, because the MSM have col­luded with politi­cians to keep the facts from them. If the govts of Oz and NZ had said what tax­pay­ers would have to fork out, at the begin­ing of the exer­cise, I doubt there would be a sker­rick of sup­port for it.

The whole thing stinks.

Whose inter­ests does this serve? Tell us now pol­lies or be burnt at the stake I say.

Robert November 22, 2009 at 6:16 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Bring on keisha and the War­rior. They can team up with Smith and Keys.
Show­down at the Al Gore coral.

corruptionfordummies November 22, 2009 at 7:14 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

the deal with Copen­hagen is about sign­ing the global gov­ern­ment doc­u­ment – smith just wants to impress his UN buddies…

watch this space: the next party line will be about ‘no one is tak­ing this seri­ously – so we’ll set up a global gov­ern­ment to enforce it’.

because of the grow­ing dis­con­tent it’ll all be hush, hush, behind the scenes now.

Cadwallader November 22, 2009 at 8:15 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I feel sad above all else that we as a nation are being inex­orably sucked into this fan­tasy world of global warm­ing. How do we explain our fool­ish­ness to our grand­chil­dren? The prospect is withering.

Budgieboy November 22, 2009 at 8:20 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Good on ya Whale… take the loopy prick out…. the sooner the better!

Lucy November 22, 2009 at 8:42 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Go Whale dont stop!!!!!

Sally November 22, 2009 at 6:34 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

7.30am – No men­tion of this scan­dal on the National radio pro­gramme. Not surprised

M Davison November 23, 2009 at 2:15 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

There is no irefutable evi­dence of cor­re­la­tion between CO2 and man made global warming.

Why is this issue not con­tin­u­ally put?

It ends all argue­ments before they start

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: