Exclusive — Te Reo Marama and Maori Smoking — Troughing 102

by Whaleoil on November 4, 2009 · 34 comments

Yes­ter­day I blogged about the exces­sive travel and globe trot­ting to exotic place that Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook did in the inter­ests of stop­ping Maori smok­ing. The sta­tis­tics of course show that he has had no impact at all on the inci­dence of Maori smok­ing. How­ever worse detail is to come.

Today I present Trough­ing 102 – How to keep get­ting fund­ing despite a damn­ing audit report.

From the OIA doc­u­ments I have received I can con­firm that Te Reo Marama obtained the fol­low­ing amounts in funding;

2004/2005 $219,778
2005/2006 $194,052
2006/2007 $276,052
2007/2008 $262,052
2008/2009 $61,945
2009/2010 $220,718.55

Total: $1,234,597

But wait there’s more…

I have also obtained OIA doc­u­ments show­ing con­sid­er­able fund­ing from Hawkes Bay DHB (and what appears to be dou­ble dip­ping) and also have been informed about some highly sus­pect fund­ing from NZAid as well. I am await­ing the OIA requests from NZAid, but I fail to see why an organ­i­sa­tion that is sup­posed to be help­ing stop smok­ing amongst Maori got ANY fund­ing from NZAid whatsoever.

For each of those years of fund­ing shown above there are required reports that the Min­istry needs to mea­sure con­tracts issued against deliv­er­ables. I have also obtained those reports for the past three years to show you just how ridicu­lously easy it is to trough money from the Min­istry of Health at least.

TRM Mon­i­tor­ing Report 1 July 2006 – 31 Octo­ber 2006 – 29 pages of which 12 pages are copies of Let­ters to the edi­tor writ­ten by Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook, newslet­ters from Te Reo Marama or news arti­cles men­tion­ing him or Te Reo Marama.
TRM Mon­i­tor­ing Report 1 Novem­ber 2006 – 30 June 2007 – 23 pages of which 8 pages are copies of Let­ters to the edi­tor writ­ten by Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook, newslet­ters from Te Reo Marama or news arti­cles men­tion­ing him or Te Reo Marama.
TRM Mon­i­tor­ing Report 1 July 2007 – 31 Decem­ber 2007 -  23 pages of which 9 pages are copies of let­ters to the edi­tor writ­ten by Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook or news arti­cles men­tion­ing him or Te Reo Marama.
TRM Mon­i­tor­ing Report 1 Jan­u­ary 2008 – 30 June 2008 – 31 pages of which 17 pages are copies of Let­ters to the edi­tor writ­ten by Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook or news arti­cles men­tion­ing him or Te Reo Marama.
TRM mon­i­tor­ing Report 1 July 2008 – 30 Sep­tem­ber 2008 – 12 pages of which 1 pages is a copy of a media release from Te Reo Marama.
TRM scop­ing doc­u­ment 1 Octo­ber 2008– 30 June 2009 – 47 pages of tosh about what TRM is going to do, and what they have done.

Those reports essen­tially cost us, the tax­payer, $7482 a page! and yet the sta­tis­tics on Maori smok­ing sug­gest we would have been bet­ter just giv­ing the mil­lions out as roll your own papers.

But here is the inter­est­ing point. In 2007 the Min­istry of Health after fund­ing Te Reo Marama since 1999 decided to con­duct its first audit of TRMThe audit report is damn­ing. Despite this audit report TRM con­tin­ued to receive Min­istry of Health fund­ing for what will be another three years.

The Audit Report, con­ducted in Novem­ber 2007 by May­hem Solu­tions Lim­ited at the behest of the Min­istry of Health details in its full 88 pages a list of defi­cien­cies so great that were Te Reo Marama a listed com­pany or indeed a nor­mal com­pany reg­is­tered at the Com­pa­nies Office would see either its shares sus­pended from trad­ing or it being struck off. The 88 pages of the report shows in detail just how out of con­trol Shane Kawaneta Bradbrook’s cult of per­son­al­ity was at Te Reo Marama.

Key find­ings of the audit report were;

  • Lack of com­pli­ance by the Board with statu­tory obligations
  • Sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of con­tracted for out­puts not achieved nor reported on. High risk
  • No per­for­mance or mon­i­tor­ing mea­sures in place for the Direc­tor (Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook). High risk
  • No suc­ces­sion plan­ning for key staff. High Risk
  • No Board min­utes of approvals of annual bud­gets. High Risk
  • No Finan­cial report­ing against bud­get, even annu­ally. High Risk
  • No reports to the Board against key targets.
  • No finan­cial man­age­ment processes where the Direc­tor can mea­sure monthly expen­di­ture against bud­get. High Risk
  • Sig­nif­i­cant ambi­gu­ity in sign off pro­ce­dures for expenses. High Risk
  • No estab­lish finan­cial del­e­ga­tions estab­lished for expen­di­tures between $500-$1000. High Risk
  • No reserves, that is all fund­ing received had been spent in con­tra­ven­tion of the State Finance Act re: Pub­lic Monies and Surpluses
  • No annual audited accounts com­pleted since 2006
  • No pol­icy or record­ing of data as per Min­Health requests. High Risk……

The list goes on and on, I have merely high­lighted the com­plete lack of man­age­r­ial, board and finan­cial con­trols at Te Reo Marama. Essen­tially all that says is that Te Reo Marama existed as the per­sonal fief­dom of Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook and no-one at the board or the Min­istry of Health saw fit to do any­thing about it.

I haven’t even started to out­line the fail­ings against deliv­er­ables as per the con­tracts with the Min­istry which seem­ingly just kept get­ting signed off and approved. If this was a pri­vate com­pany the Direc­tors would be liable for pros­e­cu­tion for fail­ing in their fidu­ciary duties as direc­tors to pro­tect share­holder funds.

Most of the the three pages of rec­om­men­da­tions and notes about the fail­ings of ser­vice deliv­ery are rated as Medium or High Risk. The def­i­n­i­tion in the report of Medium Risk is “The impact or like­li­hood of the even occur­ring may result in, some instances of con­trac­tual non-compliance, finan­cial loss impact of 5–10% of fund­ing”. High Risk is described as “Sig­nif­i­cant instances of con­trac­tual non-compliance and/or inabil­ity to deliver against the con­tract, Inter­ven­tion required by senior man­age­ment and the Board to resolve ser­vice deliv­ery and qual­ity issues, seri­ous risk to client/patient safety, and finan­cial loss impact of more than 10% of funding”.

Essen­tially Te Reo Marama is a bomb wait­ing to go off and now because of this blog it has gone off. Worse is yet to come on this story. The 88 page audit report came about from just two days spent at Te Reo Marama. None of the Board were inter­viewed and no finan­cial audits were performed.

If the audi­tors had spent more time there, and/or con­ducted a full finan­cial and foren­sic audit as well as inter­ro­gated the Board mem­bers who knows what else may have been found. This report is damn­ing enough but since that report Te Reo marama has recieved more than $500,000 in addi­tional fund­ing from the taxpayer.

Just what sort of con­trol mea­sures were or are in place at the Min­istry of Health that an organ­i­sa­tion such as Te Reo Marama can con­tinue to trough despite egre­gious and out­ra­geous fail­ures in delivery.

Tomor­row: Trough­ing 103: How to be on a Board and dou­ble dip and trough as well.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

Related Posts:

{ 33 comments }

Naylor November 3, 2009 at 9:15 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

This needs an INVESTIGATION by some­one other than the Min­istry of Health. This is a total disgrace.

TJD November 4, 2009 at 8:55 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Inter­est­ing infor­ma­tion. I am very aware that this is merely a snap­shot of inter­nal work­ings within an organ­i­sa­tion and am very clear of the following:

The Work of Te Ao Marama in not just com­bat­ing, but trans­form­ing tobacco use among Maori has been huge. Shane Brad­brook is pos­si­bly one of the most staunches advo­cates against tobacco use that I have ever come across con­sid­er­ing my long term back­ground in smok­ing ces­sa­tion and Maori health. Shane and his col­leagues have con­tributed to the devel­op­ment of the smoke free quit­line, the NRT pro­gramme, Health Spon­sor­ship pro­grammes for youth, the smoke­free envi­ron­ments leg­is­la­tion bill, all key areas that have not only impacted pos­i­tively on Maori (and there are plenty of fig­ures to dis­pute what you have put on this blog in regards to smok­ing rates among Maori).

Te Ao Marama has con­tributed to the trans­for­ma­tion of the smok­ing cul­ture within Aotearoa, and among Maoridom as a whole, it is not a quick fix, easy to see process, but the process has worked and will con­tinue to do so.

In regards the inter­nal issues that you raise, this is some­thing that only the organ­i­sa­tion can talk to.

How­ever I chal­lenge the writer of this blog the following:

Have you spo­ken to Shane and the board face to face about your issues?
Why the face­less process of cre­at­ing a blog, are you going to be account­able for the results of your actions on Shanes whanau and com­mu­nity?
Have you taken mul­ti­ple per­spec­tives on this issue?
What are your out­comes in this?

I agree, if there is a mis­use of pub­lic funds then this is an issue, how­ever you must have your facts air­tight, backed up.

I hope there is a place for dia­logue within this as the work under­taken by Te Ao Marama has been magnificent.

whistleblower November 5, 2009 at 12:53 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I don’t think any­one has a prob­lem or issue with organ­i­sa­tions that are account­able and actu­ally achieve things, how­ever with this exam­ple of Te Reo Marama, the Gov­ern­ment only recently cut their fund­ing. The issue is that no-one in the tobacco con­trol team within the Min­istry of Health has taken respon­si­bil­ity over the mil­lions of dol­lars that goes to these groups.

There are oth­ers within the Min­istry that are deeply con­cerned about the polit­i­cal antics of this team and the cul­ture of hand-outs of tax-payer fund­ing with lit­tle regard to the value they get.

Shane Brad­brook has failed the test of account­abil­ity and Te Reo Marama has failed the test of proper gov­er­nance. If Whale had not exposed this, then there can be lit­tle doubt that the tobacco con­trol team would have swept this under the car­pet. The spot­light is now on this team within the Min­istry and from key peo­ple in the Government.

Smok­ing rates among Maori are alarm­ingly high as out­lined in these posts. The question(s) that has con­sis­tently failed to be answered is why was the Min­istry (and other gov­ern­ment depart­ments) con­tin­u­ing to fund an organ­i­sa­tion that has not lived up to the basic stan­dards of gov­er­nance and b) why was the audit report was ignored which should have set off alarm bells within the tobacco con­trol team within the Min­istry of Health.

DLMMackie November 3, 2009 at 9:27 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

This can­not get any worse can it? Looks like it will.

What’s the bet that var­i­ous Par­lia­men­tary Ques­tions will now start being asked to Tony Ryall about the per­for­mance of the MOH’s pub­lic health unit. If this is the tip of the ice­berg, then surely heads must roll at the MOH. This can­not be allowed to be a whitewash.

ManservantBob November 4, 2009 at 9:00 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Does any­one remem­ber a cer­tain Min­is­ter of Health, a partners/husbands busi­ness part­ner and some HBDHB contracts????

What was the story there again?

Whaleoil November 4, 2009 at 9:14 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Just wait till tomor­row my friend, more will be revealed in the never end­ing story of trough­ing by Te Reo Marama

hillary November 3, 2009 at 9:30 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Will be inter­est­ing to see if Pro­fes­sor Simon Chap­man from the Uni­ver­sity of Syd­ney can defend this stuff?

Or maybe those apol­o­gists Ben or Mickey can try and explain the audit report on behalf of Shane Kawaneta Bradbrook?

Adolf Fiinkensein November 3, 2009 at 9:47 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Reminds me of a lady from Wai­heke Island who, a few years ago, approached the Busi­ness Men­tor Scheme for some free busi­ness advice. Her ‘busi­ness’ con­sisted of lodg­ing grant appli­ca­tions with var­i­ous char­i­ties and trusts. Trou­ble is, the appli­cants were all bogus. All the money came to her and she was doing very well thank you.

The cheeky bitch wanted some help for free so that she could become ‘more effi­cient’ in her extrac­tion of monsy from the pub­lic purse.

Inventory2 November 3, 2009 at 10:04 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Cam – I hope that you’ve sent the link to Tony Ryall’s press sec­re­tary, because it won’t be long before some­one in the MSM has no option but to run the story, even though you have scooped them!

And the audi­tors were May­hem Solu­tions – that’s very appropriate!

FunFreddy November 3, 2009 at 10:19 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Bradbrook’s shit is all fucked now.

peter November 3, 2009 at 10:40 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

I won­der why the sig­nif­i­cant drop in fund­ing for the 2008/2009 year? Is that as close as the Min­istry could come to “pun­ish­ing” TRM for the piss poor per­for­mance? But obvi­ously he’s been screw­ing the right person/people as the 2010 fund­ing is right back up there!!!

Johnboy November 3, 2009 at 10:40 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

No sweat cuz it’s a Murri out­fit so no crime com­mit­ted. We owe the bros for rip­ping them off with the blan­kets and beads eh bro!

Seneca November 3, 2009 at 11:31 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

The Health/NGO sec­tor is full of these rorts. When you fin­ish with this bunch, have a look at the num­ber of Maori men­tal health Ngo ‘contracts”.

mediatart November 4, 2009 at 12:02 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

This was inter­est­ing com­ment from Whale..

If this was a pri­vate com­pany the Direc­tors would be liable for pros­e­cu­tion for fail­ing in their fidu­ciary duties as direc­tors to pro­tect share­holder funds.

Pros­e­cu­tion ? For a pri­vate com­pany. A bit close to home Whale to go THAT far

Bok November 4, 2009 at 3:25 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

And again medi­atart shows the total lack of intel­lect of the left. You have to be one of the sad­dest peo­ple who lives in that dreary lit­tle coun­try (never used to be dreary – was vibrant and excit­ing until the loony left destroyed it). Whale presents some facts and fig­ures, you can­not attack the facts, so you play the man. Well done. Let me guess. You feel oppressed by men, and you have been badly treated in your ear­lier years (which is prob­a­bly 3 years ago) .

The fact that Maori was robbed of money that was meant to go to the bet­ter­ment of their health is of no con­cern to you.

How sad it must be to be you….

peterwn November 4, 2009 at 12:26 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

But surely is it not bet­ter for the bureau­crats just to sign off the reports and pay the money, than to risk career dam­ag­ing events such as H2 scream­ing down the phone at them when Shane accuses the Gov­ern­ment of racism.

wistleblower November 4, 2009 at 12:38 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Have to say that I haven’t stopped laugh­ing since this blog ran the trough­ing posts. Hav­ing worked inside var­i­ous gov­ern­ment depart­ments, I can guar­an­tee that the Min­istry of Health will have a team of peo­ple work­ing on this to ensure that if the mud starts fly­ing, they will be able to blame some­body else. No doubt they will have pre­pared a brief­ing paper for their DDG and will be mon­i­tor­ing this site like a hawk – and pray­ing that the Domin­ion Post / TV3 / TV One or the Her­ald don’t pick this up.

Obvi­ously Whale has scored a direct hit against a well insti­tu­tion­alised trougher and this Shane Brad­brook guy will strug­gle to ever again score a gov­ern­ment con­tract. His fair weather “friends” will be run­ning for cover as they try to avoid any link­ages with either him or the organ­i­sa­tion Te Reo Marama.

Over on the Hill, staffers will be watch­ing this develop and be work­ing out how to advise var­i­ous Min­is­ters as the story con­tin­ues to develop. With lit­tle else on the polit­i­cal radar this story cer­tainly has legs.

dlmmackie November 4, 2009 at 12:43 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

So if the Min­istry of Health has a team on this to con­trol the dam­age, then how come they didn’t have a team of peo­ple mon­i­tor­ing the con­tract with Shane Kawaneta Brad­brook or act on the damn­ing audit report?

Or where they afraid because he kept say­ing he was friends with Pita Sharples and Tar­i­ana Turia?

whistleblower November 4, 2009 at 1:20 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I’ve heard that the Min­istry is very wor­ried about this because of the role a num­ber of this organisation’s cur­rent Direc­tors have within the health sec­tor. Watch how they man­age the per­ceived con­flicts of inter­est with this one!

Scanner November 4, 2009 at 12:55 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Wait for the inevitable, “You’re just pick­ing on me cause I’m a Mowree”

Murray M November 4, 2009 at 4:41 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Even bet­ter to be gay and a Mowree

mediatart November 4, 2009 at 1:24 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Guess what they are set­ting up a ‘national DHB’ where All the bigs guys can screw the health sys­tem with big bloated con­tracts for some­thing the DHBs do in house .

Which of course is deja vue , as we used to have STATE run national IT sys­tems for health before the National Party ’ reforms’ of the nineties.

Nationa were the ones who set up the sys­tem of ‘out­sourc­ing’ , along with the waste­ful mul­ti­ple DHBs ( there was once only 3 for all of the NI above Taupo)

Its easy to rip off the state by big com­pa­nies for IT , first you bid low , get the work and then when all the experts have left the state sec­tor, push the prices through the roof as they have no where to go and no staff who have a clue

ernesto November 4, 2009 at 3:27 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Pity your string pullers didn’t give you the heads-up for the ‘LabTests Lied’ story. Feel like a cheap PR whore yet?

Anonymous November 4, 2009 at 3:46 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Labtests lied? How Ernesto? The DHB were mon­i­tor­ing them through­out the han­dover period and even before. If Labtests aren’t per­form­ing then why wont the DHB pull their con­tract? Because they can’t that’s why as the DHB are lying.

And – has any­one died yet? No.

In any instance the DHB and labtest and I belive DML (although they have breached it all along) have in their con­tract a “non-conflict” clause not to crit­i­cise one another which the DHB has just breached by pub­licly stat­ing rub­bish about it’s supplier.

ernesto November 4, 2009 at 4:14 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Q. If Labtests aren’t per­form­ing then why wont the DHB pull their contract?

A. I think they prob­a­bly will.

If the DHB Chair was lying LabRats would be at the High Court scream­ing defama­tion as quick as look at you. They haven’t even expressly denied that allegation.

On your last (bull­shit) point the Con­trac­tual Reme­dies Act views seri­ous mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion (which gets can­cel­la­tion and dam­ages as of right) as far worse than a breach of a minor ‘non-conflict’ clause (which gets dam­ages only as a dis­cre­tion). You are talk­ing a load of shit. You can expect your LabTests cheques to start bounc­ing any­time soon.

Anonymous November 4, 2009 at 6:11 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I don’t think they pay teach­ers money to pro­mote LT’s chump. That’s right I am a school teacher and my part­ner is a nurse. So what do you do all day then?

QNH1008 November 4, 2009 at 5:32 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Obvi­ously Shane is doing a mar­vel­lous job – he’s put some salt on some wounds some­where – a group of peo­ple who think profit is the most impor­tant thing no mat­ter what the cost are obvi­ously squirm­ing about some­thing. It’s a plea­sure to the out­pour­ing of pus from Whale Oil and co in response to some seri­ous action on death sticks.

dlmmackie November 4, 2009 at 8:47 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Another trougher try­ing to spin the direc­tion of this inves­ti­ga­tion else­where. As oth­ers have said Whale is actu­ally hold­ing these groups to account. Good on him. Its really that sim­ple. The facts speak for themselves.

demigod1 November 17, 2009 at 9:07 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Whale oil….you must be a —-on one big hate mis­sion!!! What the hell is your prob­lem? I agree with QNH1008….Mr Brad­brook must of rubbed you right up your —- —– to get you so vii­i­icious!!!! Think of all the other arse-wipes who have ripped the coun­try off…this guy is a small fish by com­par­i­son. Is it because maybe he didn’t sleep with you or didn’t give you the time of day for you to react in such a NASTY ASS HOLISH way? Get a life, build a bridge go jump off a —— 10 storey build­ing mate…get over your­self, you sound so like an —- —-!!!!!

Naylor November 17, 2009 at 9:27 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Set­tle down there love. What a nasty and vicious post. The real­ity is that Shane Kawe­nata Brad­brook has been rip­ping off the tax­payer for years and has been found out. He and his fel­low trustee direc­tors on Te Reo Marama should pay the money back. The damn­ing audit report iden­ti­fies a dis­turb­ing lack of gov­er­nance and trough­ing by these ‘do-gooders’.

If you’re defend­ing this, then you must be part of some other trough­ing organ­i­sa­tion that will be hunted down and exposed as well. Peo­ple in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

Shane Kawe­nata Brad­brook is just one exam­ple of trough­ing that needs to be exposed and held to account. Oth­ers include Te Hotu Man­awa and other claim­ing to rep­re­sent Maori. Speak­ing of which, they must have been hell­ishly suc­cess­ful con­sid­er­ing the ongo­ing high Maori smok­ing rates.

oldgolfer November 4, 2009 at 6:46 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

You almost have to admire the trougher; I’d like to see the white-shirts who allowed this to hap­pen to be nailed. All power to your arm, Whale.

thor42 November 4, 2009 at 7:07 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

@mediatart – if the “DHB in-house” soul­tions are so great, then how come they have 23 sys­tems which can’t “talk” to each other? In other words, they’re incom­pat­i­ble. Wow, great use of money there.
Learn about IT, honey (it’s my field) and come back in a few years time.

WHISTLEBLOWER November 4, 2009 at 8:23 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Whale, when is the next instal­ment of this fas­ci­nat­ing story? Trough­ing 103 about the Direc­tors of Te Reo Marama – which WILL def­i­nitely make some offi­cials in the Min­istry of Health decid­edly uneasy.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: