Matthew Hooton in NBR (I bloody had to traipse up to the Howick Stationers again) makes the case based on an Australian precedent that Michael Cullen and Maryan Street should be in the slammer doing hard time for their deliberate malfeasance over ACC.
In 2001, Australian insurance giant HIH collapsed with debts of around A$5 billion, caused by gross mismanagement, including charging too little for premiums and failing to put enough aside for claims.
The Australian authorities took the matter seriously, including Prime Minister John Howard, who established a royal commission. The company’s principals were jailed for offences including knowingly disseminating false information, filing false financial statements, being intentionally dishonest and failing to discharge their duties in good faith and in the best interests of the company.
The Australian authorities’ rigor might help explain why the Australian financial system is perhaps the only one in the world to be almost entirely untouched by the global financial crisis.
Exactly, I was living in Australia at the time of this collpase and was also involved with helping ASIC with some software that nailed these pricks. The other thing that Australian has is the ACCC as well that has largely prevented the collapse of financial institutions like the collpases we have seen here.
The similarities between ACC and HIH are astounding.
This week, New Zealand’s biggest insurer, ACC, reported a NZ$4.8 billion loss on top of a NZ$2.4 billion loss the previous year.
Major factors were charging too little for premiums and paying out too much in claims. It contributed materially to the Crown’s deficit reaching an unprecedented and disastrous $10.5 billion in the year to June 2009.
Like HIH, ACC’s crisis was knowingly hidden from the public. The Treasury’s Pre-Election Economic and Fiscal Update, signed by then finance minister Michael Cullen, did not disclose it, a failure subsequently found by an independent inquiry to have breached the Public Finance Act.
Even worse were the public statements of then-ACC minister Maryan Street.
On June 26, 2008, ACC was apparently strong enough for Ms Street to announce that 400,000 casual and seasonal workers would get improved cover.
On September 11, she had enough confidence in the company’s finances to announce a re-elected Labour government would cut the motor vehicle levy from $254 to $203.
Three weeks later, and just five weeks before the election, Ms Street was at it again, announcing an expansion of ACC entitlements to people over 65.
The most charitable interpretation is that the former university academic might suffer from some advanced form of oniomania that makes her believe that, despite ballooning liabilities and a global financial crisis, it was possible to keep buying new services from ACC, while cutting its revenue, and expect it to remain viable. Alternatively, perhaps she was just telling lies in the heat of a close election campaign.
Union boss and Labour insider Ross Wilson, then ACC’s chairman, was also complicit.
Why are they not awaiting trial no? Oh that’s right, maryan is off on a jaunt with deputy leader Phil Goff and Michael Cullen got given a job to fuck off out of parliament. This is why, I have been calling, seemingly upon deaf ears about the formation of an Independent Commission against Corruption. if this wasn’t collusion at a minimum then it was corruption to deceive in an election year.
Perhaps we even need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, without the reconciliation.

Popularity: 4% [?]







most of the material mentioned here came out in and around the election .. much was made of it at the time then it stopped after the scumsuckers got kicked out .. now we are all up for big increases to get ACC back up (some are saying the massive losses are “funny money”, nothing funny about my money, to where it will be “safe” BUT Labour are slagging Smith and the Nats off!!!! I’m sure there are improvements that can be made before the Feb deadline but at least this is a start. I’m not happy about the increases but I accept them as required .. mind you, I don’t own a motor bike
Like or Dislike:
0
0
They put lie upon lie, and then left the Nats to clean up the mess — again. But we should also blame every physio and doctor — and patients — who were only too happy to frolic in the largesse that was the ACC.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
O dear Serial liar Hooten is up to his tricks again. But the repeaters like DPFcant help themselves
The enquiry , ordered by National found it was all treasurys fault. ThatTreasury who wrote the prefu didnt follow their own rules.
It had nothing to do with Cullen.
Hooten knows this this is why hes wrote it carefully to fool the ignorant. He doesnt say that Cullen ‘knew’ just that he signed it .
Im surprised the Whale has been taken in. Hes usually smarter than that and can see bullshit a mile away
Heres the the Inquiry ordered by English
http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/acc+shortfall+...
Heres the Treasury Sececretary taking the blame
The Inquiry released today concluded that the ACC funding shortfall should have been disclosed in the 2008 Pre-election Economic and Fiscal Update (PREFU) in terms of what is required by the Public Finance Act 1989.
“The Treasury takes responsibility for this error, and I have expressed my apologies and regret to the Minister of Finance. I accept the conclusions of the Inquiry and commit to acting speedily on the Inquiry’s recommendations. The Minister of Finance will be kept informed of the Treasury’s progress in taking action on this matter,” Mr Whitehead said
http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/media-sp...
Of course Hooten and Farrar are total cunts and should have their balls cut off for this slimy farrago of lies
Like or Dislike:
0
0
BTW HIH were the best company I ever worked for . Made money to start with by denying workers compensation for employers.
Cheap loans, generous use of company vehicles, fly the staff on trips to Paris or South America. All went to custard after I left
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The ACC return on their investments over the last 17 years has turned $1000 in to $5000.
Nearly 10% annual return.
Thats what helped keep the levys down for the last few years of Labour.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
A total travesty of Justice that Ray went to jail
Like or Dislike:
0
0
And which corporate failure has the pleasure of your employment these days?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Ohh honey… where have you been all my life.… are why arent you still there
Like or Dislike:
0
0