Why Len Brown would be a lousy Mayor

by Whaleoil on September 28, 2009 · 6 comments

Here’s why Len Brown would make a lousy mayor of Auck­land. He can’t get the rub­bish col­lected prop­erly – for two weeks a revolt­ing unhy­gienic mess was spread all over a local park next to res­i­den­tial housing.

If he can’t keep his own back­yard clean in Manukau, how can Wait­akere or North Shore trust him to get basic things right like rub­bish collection?

Maybe Len’s too busy think­ing of free swim­ming pools, Maori Seats and how Sue Brad­ford could use our rates to fund unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits to care about basic coun­cil ser­vices like rubbish.

Look on the bright side though – even the rats get social hous­ing under Len Brown!

Pop­u­lar­ity: 6% [?]

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

{ 6 comments }

toad September 27, 2009 at 6:31 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Whale, you’re really push­ing it with this one. A Mayor is respon­si­ble for the gov­er­nance of a city. Oper­a­tional mat­ters such as the time­li­ness of an inor­ganic rub­bish col­lec­tion sim­ply are not the Mayor’s respon­si­bil­ity – Len Brown prob­a­bly would not have even known about it until it hit the media.

And an inor­ganic rub­bish col­lec­tion is by its nature not the unhy­gienic mess you refer to.

At least Len Brown didn’t say 2,700 coun­cil employ­ees would lose their jobs under the supercity tran­si­tion, and then be forced to back­track on it, as your poster boy for the May­oralty did.

As for Sue Brad­ford, where did she advo­cate spendign rates on unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits, which if you knew any­thing about the Local Gov­ern­ment Act can’t be done any­way? You’re mak­ing it up.

Robert Winter September 27, 2009 at 7:22 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Nice one, Toad. And whilst we’re on Wowser Banks, what about the stuff-up on bar and hostelry con­trols, caus­ing a pre­cip­i­tate and igno­min­ious retreat? And Mr Bhat­na­gar blames offi­cials for his stuff-up, rather than tak­ing respon­si­bil­ity, as he should. Mr Banks, in dam­age con­trol mode, is tak­ing respon­si­bil­ity him­self, as he should. Com­pared with this, a drummed-up story about Manukau’s inor­ganic rub­bish col­lec­tion is triv­ial stuff.

mediatart September 27, 2009 at 9:30 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Exactly Bhat­man has really strug­gled once he gets to sit with the big boys on the over­stuffed Edwar­dian fur­ni­ture of the may­ors office.

Scanner September 27, 2009 at 11:42 pm

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Per­haps Super Sue and Loose­mouth Len could bring in a plan where the unem­ployed pick up the rub­bish in exchange for us con­tin­u­ing their dole pay­ments, as a foot­note we could ask the recip­i­ents of our dole pay­ments to turn in a claen drugs test before we pay them, just like many of the work­force.
This would help to pre­con­di­tion them for return to full time work?

Hurf Durf September 28, 2009 at 3:46 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

LOLOL, I live about five min­utes away from there.

Yeah, Len Brown is a dirty bas­tard. In ret­ro­spect I wish I had voted so Quax would have got in. I’m defo vot­ing to stop him get­ting the supercity. I want to see deli­cious pro­gres­sive tears again.

jabba September 28, 2009 at 7:00 am

Like or Dis­like: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

wow, just imag­ine a Len Brown/Sue Brad­ford ticket for run­ning the so called super city .. yehaaaa.
I live in the Nthn part of Waiuku so will be a Super city voter so, if those 2 got in, I could move a cou­ple of streets and be in Waikato .. fan­tas­tic, I think!!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: