November 2008

Abortion and mental health link

by Whaleoil November 30, 2008

Women who have an abor­tion are more likely to suf­fer sub­se­quent poor men­tal health, accord­ing to a new survey.

The Uni­ver­sity of Otago study found women who had an abor­tion faced a 30 per cent increase in the risk of devel­op­ing com­mon men­tal health prob­lems such as depres­sion and anxiety.

Well duh!

Of course there is a link, you have to have men­tal health issues any­way in order get an abor­tion in the first instance. That is how we effec­tively have abor­tion on demand even when the law pro­hibits it.

The grounds for abor­tion are:

  • Seri­ous dan­ger to life
  • Seri­ous dan­ger to phys­i­cal health
  • Seri­ous dan­ger to men­tal health
  • Any form of incest or sex­ual rela­tions with a guardian
  • Men­tal subnormality
  • Fetal abnor­mal­ity (added in the July 1978 amendment)

In the lat­est sta­tis­tics for abor­tion that show the Kiwi women mur­dered over 18,000 chil­dren, 98–99 per­cent of all abor­tions are per­formed because of seri­ous dan­ger to the men­tal health of the woman.

Got that, our chil­dren are being killed because of dan­ger of men­tal health of the woman. End of story, there is no sec­ond fac­tor, the num­bers are unequiv­o­cal, fort you have to have a dan­ger to your men­tal health before you have the abor­tion, it then stands to rea­son that wwomen who have an abor­tion then have a 30% increased risk fac­tor for fur­ther men­tal health issues. Of the 18,380 abor­tions per­formed last year, 18196 of them were to women who sup­pos­edly faced seri­ous dan­ger to their men­tal health. That is a whole lot of crazy peo­ple roam­ing around out there.

Of course that is noth­ing com­pared to the 100% fatal­ity sta­tis­tics for the babies that were aborted, but no one asked their opinion.

While I am talk­ing about abor­tion, how come sup­port­ers of abor­tion worry about the num­bers hav­ing abor­tions? I don’t get it, I thought it was about a wom­ans right to choose, surely that isn’t a bad thing?

We have cam­paigns to stop peo­ple smok­ing. Why? Because it is BAD. We have cam­paigns to stop peo­ple tak­ing drugs. Why? Because they are BAD.…..now we are going to have a camoaign to reduce the  num­bers of abor­tions which wwe have already estab­lished was about a woman choos­ing, so how can that be bad? Surely we’d like the num­bers to go up?

Unless of course abor­tion really is bad.….I guess now there are stud­ies show­ing that you have 30% increased like­li­hood of men­tal ill­ness that’d be a start to telling us abor­tion is bad. Of course we have already estab­lished that you have to be in dan­ger of being men­tal any­way to get an abortion.

Link to Full Article 9 comments

Viscount Monckton fisks Obama

by Whaleoil November 30, 2008

Vis­count Mon­ck­ton has done the unthink­able, he has chal­lenged the great, the only, the won­drous, Obama and his woolly think­ing on Cli­mate Change.

Obama said;

“Few chal­lenges fac­ing Amer­ica and the world are more urgent than com­bat­ing cli­mate change. The sci­ence is beyond dis­pute and the facts are clear. Sea lev­els are ris­ing. Coast­lines are shrink­ing. We’ve seen record drought, spread­ing famine, and storms that are grow­ing stronger with each pass­ing hur­ri­cane sea­son. Cli­mate change and our depen­dence on for­eign oil, if left unad­dressed, will con­tinue to weaken our econ­omy and threaten our national security.”

Vis­count Mon­ck­ton retorts with facts;

Few chal­lenges fac­ing Amer­ica and the world are less urgent than com­bat­ing the non-problem of “global warm­ing”. On all mea­sures, there has been no increase in global mean sur­face tem­per­a­tures since 1995; and, accord­ing to the Uni­ver­sity of Alabama at Huntsville, near-surface tem­per­a­tures in 2008 will be lower than in 1980, 28 years ago, the first com­plete year of satel­lite obser­va­tions. On all mea­sures, global tem­per­a­tures have been falling for seven full years since late 2001. The January-to-January fall in tem­per­a­tures between 2007 and 2008 was the great­est since global tem­per­a­ture records were first com­piled in 1880, 128 years ago. The rate of new Arc­tic sea-ice for­ma­tion in mid-October 2008 was among the fastest since satel­lite records began almost 30 years ago. There has been no decline what­so­ever in the total global extent of sea ice since satel­lite records began. New records for the extent of northern-hemisphere snow cover were observed by the satel­lites in the win­ter of 2001 and again in 2007. This year, many ski resorts are open­ing early as Arc­tic weather strikes. Many tem­per­a­ture sta­tions in the north­ern hemi­sphere recorded record low tem­per­a­tures in October/November 2008.

So Obama got it wrong, in fact so spec­tac­u­larly wrong it beg­gars belief. One won­ders when the rest of the “believ­ers” are going to wake up the the real facts not the man­u­fac­tur­ered pseudo-science of the IPCC. Yet these tossers all say that the sci­ence is set­tled, that there is con­sen­sus, this most demon­stra­bly is false as Vis­count Mon­ck­ton points outs;

Obama is not cor­rect to say, “The sci­ence is not in dis­pute.” Across all dis­ci­plines, some 31,000 sci­en­tists approached by the Ore­gon Insti­tute of Sci­ence and Med­i­cine in 2007/8 signed a dec­la­ra­tion to the effect that “global warm­ing” is not a global cri­sis and that humankind has very lit­tle influ­ence over the cli­mate. A sur­vey of cli­ma­tol­o­gists and sci­en­tists in related fields by Van Storch (2005/6) estab­lished that a con­sid­er­able pro­por­tion of respon­dents did not believe the alarmist notions dis­sem­i­nated by Al Gore or the UN climate-change panel. The office of Sen­a­tor James Inhofe main­tains a list of more than 500 sci­en­tists in cli­mate and related fields who have made pub­lic state­ments ques­tion­ing at least one aspect of what has falsely been pre­sented as a sci­en­tific “consensus”.

In any event, as the late Michael Crich­ton used to say, “If it’s con­sen­sus, it isn’t sci­ence: if it’s sci­ence, it isn’t con­sen­sus.” Sci­ence is not done by con­sen­sus: and, even if it were, the evi­dence is that a very con­sid­er­able body of sci­en­tists both within and beyond cli­ma­tol­ogy have grave doubts about the notion of a sig­nif­i­cant and dam­ag­ing human influ­ence on the climate.

Vis­count Mon­ck­ton goes on to destroy any shred of cred­i­bil­ity Obama has on this issue, line by line and detail by detail. Warmists and other co-religionists would do well to edu­cate them­selves. Of course, for dar­ing to dif­fer in opin­ion from the Great Obama he will now be vil­i­fied. Be that as it may, the truth is the truth and facts are facts.

Link to Full Article 17 comments

Vote splitting stats shows the traitors

by Whaleoil November 30, 2008

DPF has enthu­si­as­ti­cally blogged about the excit­ing vote split­ting sta­tis­tics, he even said they were “great fun”.

Ahem…great fun is any­thing but sta­tis­tics, even get­ting the clap from a hooker would be great fun when com­pared to statistics.

On the other hand though, the vote split­ting stats show where the trai­tors are;

  1. ACT — 72.6% voted for the National can­di­date, 4.9% Labour cand, 16.4% ACT cand
  2. National — 85.5% National, 3.5% Labour, 4.2% ACT

ACT has 4.9% of their sup­port­ers as trai­tors and National 3.5%. These are the vot­ers that “pre­tend” to sup­port you and at the same time vote pinko. I can’t be both­ered com­ment­ing on the pinko par­ties, who cares about them anyway?

If this was Zim­babwe we would at least be able to find out who they were so as to send them off for a spot of re-education. ;)

 

Link to Full Article 7 comments

Three Stooges: Govt should go with emissions trading scheme

by Whaleoil November 30, 2008

Niel­son, Tay­lor & Clark: Govt should go with emis­sions trad­ing scheme — The new Government’s deci­sion to put the emis­sions trad­ing scheme on hold pend­ing a review came as a bolt from the blue. Stake­hold­ers had been led to expect that there would be some changes to the ETS but the pro­posal to pass leg­is­la­tion… [NZ Her­ald Pol­i­tics]

Labour’s stooges are carp­ing on end­lessly about the Emmis­sions Trad­ing Scheme and the mora­to­rium that has been placed on it by National until a select com­mit­tee can review the science.

these folk are in “result denial” and they still think they are rel­e­vant. Sadly for them their access to patsy min­is­ters has been cut off and that is the real rea­son they are act­ing like a buch of head­less chooks.

As a pub­lic ser­vice peo­ple should direct them to this web­site so they can digest, slowly, the clearly unpalat­able news of the demise of the cor­rupt and crooked Labour First government.

While we are at it we should sim­i­larly point Jeanette to the same page. She seems to think Kiwi’s care more than about 7% about the envi­ron­ment. Her post on Frog Blog is noth­ing more than a rant and cry.

Link to Full Article 1 comment

Movember — Almost there

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Movember - Changing the Face of a Men's Health

Almost there folks, with con­tri­bu­tions of a $100.00 each from Aaron Gilmore and Craig Foss I am creep­ing toward the top 50 and cur­rently sit­ting at 63.

I chal­lenge all other National and Act MP’s to bet­ter their dona­tions espe­cially the ones I inter­viewed for the Blog­Mo­bile. Don’t let Cac­tus Kate and David Far­rar show you up.

Let’s show Movem­ber some real Tory Char­ity. Donate here, and think of the poor Labour MP’s as they suf­fer under the depres­sion of los­ing the election.

Remem­ber, all dona­tions over $10 are tax deductible.

The money raised by Movem­ber is used to raise aware­ness of men’s health issues and donated to the Can­cer Soci­ety of New Zealand and the Men­tal Health Foun­da­tion of New Zealand. These two char­i­ties will use the money raised to fund research and increase sup­port net­works for those affected with prostate can­cer and expe­ri­enc­ing depres­sion espe­cially those poor Labour MP’s.

Link to Full Article 2 comments

Last day of Movember

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

MovemberToday is the last day of Movember.

Thank you to all my donors. I have made it to the Top 100.

If you would like to help kick me higher then please click the link to donate to my Mo’. I only need $200 to get in the top 50.

Remem­ber, all dona­tions over $10 are tax deductible.

The money raised by Movem­ber is used to raise aware­ness of men’s health issues and donated to the Can­cer Soci­ety of New Zealand and the Men­tal Health Foun­da­tion of New Zealand. These two char­i­ties will use the money raised to fund research and increase sup­port net­works for those affected with prostate can­cer and expe­ri­enc­ing depression.

Link to Full Article

Mike Williams still hasn’t resigned

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Mike “Fat Tony” Williams has announced that he will resign from the Pres­i­dency of the Labour Party this week.

He still hasn’t announced his res­ig­na­tion from all the Gov­ern­ment appoint­ments he has recieved as a loyal stooge to Helen Clark.

Some peo­ple may ask why he should resign. The answer of course is sim­ple. He has no integrity. As DPF said;

Williams tried to prove that the Prime Min­is­ter was NZ’s biggest fraud­ster. He per­son­ally drove and man­aged an attempted smear cam­paign. He even blogged about it as Bat­man. He sent copies of doc­u­ments to jour­nal­ists at their home addresses. Hav­ing done all that, how ca he expect to be trusted to gov­ern any crown entity on behalf of the new Government?

That is exactly why he should be sacked if he hasn’t yet resigned.

It is expected that Andrew Lit­tle will replace “Fat Tony” as pres­i­dent of the Labour mak­ing a mock­ery of the con­tention that the EPMU has noth­ing at all to do with the admin­is­tra­tion of the Labour Party. Andrew Lit­tle is ada­ment that he can remain as the boss of teh EPMU at the same time.

I think it may well be time for some reform of the Union indus­try and a clar­i­fi­ca­tion in law as to who/what can be a mem­ber of a polit­i­cal party.

I would change the law so that only nat­ural per­sons can be a mem­ber or affli­ate or any other weasel word used to describe an asso­ci­a­tion of a polit­i­cal party.

Then I would estab­lish a Unions Com­mis­sion in order to mon­i­tor unions. They would be charged with reg­is­tra­tion of unions and ensur­ing that they are fis­cally pru­dent with mem­bers funds, trans­par­ently demo­c­ra­tic and act­ing at all times in the fidu­ciary and other inter­ests of their mem­bers and only their members.

If it was good enough to reg­u­late the Real Estate indus­try then it should be good enough to reg­u­late the Union Indus­try. My first appoint­ments to the com­mis­sion would be Matt McCarten and Laila Harre.

Link to Full Article 3 comments

Bill Ralston : Playing the fool with our money

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Bill Ral­ston : Play­ing the fool with our money — Mes­sage to John Key and his new Gov­ern­ment: No pres­sure. Well, just a global finan­cial mar­ket col­lapse, a deep­en­ing reces­sion, a grow­ing deficit, a cri­sis meet­ing with many of the world’s top lead­ers, shrink­ing com­mod­ity prices… [NZ Her­ald Pol­i­tics]

Bill Ral­ston suc­cinctly explains the tough times that Bill Eng­lish is hav­ing to grap­ple with in try­ing to lessen the effects of the reces­sion in new Zealand after inher­it­ing a finan­cial mess from the pre­vi­ous Labour Government.

Though it is use­ful to look at this, he really is writ­ing about the par­lous state of TVNZ and their merry-go-round with our money.

It should not take long for Cole­man to won­der why a com­pany that rakes in more than $300 mil­lion a year in rev­enue makes no profit other than the sub­sidy it gets from him.

His next thought will prob­a­bly be to ques­tion how much of the $79 mil­lion fund­ing for the free­view dig­i­tal chan­nels TVNZ 6 and TVNZ 7 is being used to cross-subsidise the main­stream oper­a­tions of TV ONE and TV3.

Indeed, espe­cially when you con­sider that TVNZ 7, I heard, was named that because of the antic­i­pated total audience.

Ral­ston serves up a good warn­ing to the fis­cal fools at TVNZ.

Par­al­lel to the Government’s 100-day plan focus­ing on pri­or­i­ties like the econ­omy and law and order is a second-tier pro­gramme that includes a “reform” of TVNZ and the wider broad­cast­ing indus­try. I sus­pect Cole­man is deter­mined to screw more div­i­dends out of TVNZ, remove gov­ern­ment sub­si­dies from it and make it com­pletely commercial.

Cole­man may also wish to make an exam­ple of a state-owned com­pany that has been play­ing silly bug­gers with tax­payer money.

Heads will roll in one of those peri­odic TVNZ purges.

I’d start with some of the gov­ern­ment stooges on the board.

Link to Full Article 1 comment

Iain Dale on Political blogging

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Iain Dale has a very good post on polit­i­cal blog­ging in the UK. There are many sim­i­lar­i­ties between the UK and NZ in terms of the evo­lu­tion of the polit­i­cal blogosphere.

Espe­cially around read­er­ship, MSM reac­tion to blog­gers and rev­enues from blogging.

Well worth a read, even though it is lengthy.

Link to Full Article

Cooling on Warming

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Andrew Bolt has a short but accu­rate post worty of post­ing in its entirety;

As the world’s tem­per­a­tures and stock mar­kets fall, so does the world’s enthu­si­asm to spend tril­lions on not not stop­ping what might not be bad even if were happening:

There is both grow­ing pub­lic reluc­tance to make per­sonal sac­ri­fices and a dis­tinct lack of enthu­si­asm for the major inter­na­tional efforts now under­way to bat­tle cli­mate change, accord­ing to find­ings of a poll of 12,000 cit­i­zens in 11 coun­tries’… The 11 coun­tries sur­veyed were Aus­tralia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Ger­many, India, Malaysia, Mex­ico, the United King­dom and the United States.

(Via Instapun­dit.)

UPDATE

Yet another edi­to­r­ial on global warm­ing from the alarmist Sun­day Age that doesn’t men­tion the most rel­e­vant fact of all.

Indeed, it seems that New Zealand in hav­ing a Select Com­mit­tee review the silly and unnec­es­sary Emmis­sions Trad­ing Scam may well be lead­ing the world in attempt­ing to halt a dan­ger­ous new reli­gion. It is time these new reli­gion­ists were exposed.

Link to Full Article

Definition of a Double Standard

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Cock of Campbells Bay - Andrew WilliamsMayor Andrew Williams, the cock of Camp­bells Bay, threat­ens to sue Wha­le­oil for call­ing him “mental”.

Mayor Andrew Williams, the cock of Camp­bells Bay calls a North Shore City coun­cil­lor a smar­tarse, and is asked to leave an offi­cial coun­cil com­mit­tee meet­ing as a result.

Truly he is a cock, men­tal and a fool while defin­ing dou­ble stan­dard with his very exis­tence. I guess like most bul­lies, he likes to dish it out, but can’t take it back.

Still wait­ing for the writ, tosser.

Link to Full Article

Cooking with Balls

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Cooking with BallsJust what every man wants for Christ­mas. A cook­book about testicles.

To quote Boing Boing;

Check out The Tes­ti­cle Cook­book: Cook­ing with Balls by Ser­bian chef, Ljubomir Erovic. This mul­ti­me­dia cook­book tells you how to peel and slice ani­mal tes­ti­cles to make such won­ders as Tes­ti­cle Pizza — just add your own toppings!

Wouldn’t you know *it* tastes like chicken. But *it* works like Viagra!

Here in Kiwi­land you are not a real man until you have eaten Moun­tain Oys­ters. They are espe­cially tasty if har­vested with your on hands and thus very, very fresh.

I’m off to the Aussie Butcher to see if they sell.….uhmmm.….balls.

Link to Full Article

Man Stuff

by Whaleoil November 29, 2008

Mavi JeansThis blog post is about man stuff even if it has a review about clothes.

First up, I went shop­ping today, I fuck­ing hate shop­ping at this time of the year. My hyper-vigilance really kicks in and causes me no end of stress.

Nev­er­the­less I had worn out yet another pair of jeans. It is the peren­nial prob­lem when you have big balls, the crotch wears out. Any­way I’m the sort of flla that likes what he likes and I had kindo set­tled on the make and model of jeans that I wear.

Except the fuck­ers at Levi’s have decided that that par­tic­u­lar model isn’t cool any­more and so I can’t buy them any­where. This was a prob­lem until the hot­tie at the jeans store rec­om­mended Mavi Jeans to me.

These things rock, the look great, the feel great and when I asked if they pull chicks like a fast car the girl at the counter looked like a stunned mul­let as she got the death­stare and I got a slap from you know who. She nod­ded slowly as she backed away from the counter.

I had never heard of Mavi jeans before so I made a quick check on the font of all knowl­edge and found out that they are a famous brand of denim jeans founded in 1991, head­quar­tered in Istan­bul, Turkey. Since being intro­duced in the US in 1996, Mavi has become one of the favorite fit­ting denim brands among young women and men. Celebrity fans include Kate Winslet, Juli­ette Lewis, Julia Stiles,Geri Hal­li­well, Annie Lennox, Sug­ababes, Billy Zane, Hillary Duff, and Jason Biggs.

And now Whaleoil!

Now on to shav­ing. As you have wit­nessed from my Movem­ber pho­tos I seem to have no prob­lem grow­ing hair. Bald­ness doesn’t run in the fam­ily. My grand­fa­ther had a full head of hair when he croaked and Dad still has good head of hair as well. I think my brother got the bad genes though. Any­way I hate shav­ing. I shave the bare min­i­mum to get away with. I con­stantly try to find shav­ing prod­ucts that have to meet sev­eral cri­te­ria. The first is that the fuck­ing blades stay sharp longer than two shaves. With­out excep­tion this require­ment dis­qual­i­fies Gillette, Wilkin­son Sword and Schick. All of their blades are com­plete rub­bish and two shaves on my beard does in the blades.

The sec­ond cri­te­ria is that the shave is close with­out tear­ing my skin off. Again all the major brands fail.

I have now found a con­tender. The King of Shaves Azor. Accrod­ing to the mar­ketng it is;

Azor“A razor that shaves closer, lasts longer and costs less. The fin­ished item looks simple.”

You know what? It does. More marketing;

“What you see is what you get. A razor, with super long last­ing (Endurium coated) car­tridges which allows you to “shave closer, for longer, for less”.”

Ok so “Endurium” is mar­ket­ing bull­shit but the blades do last longer, they are quite a bit cheaper and they cer­tainly shave closer than all the other crap brands out there. I went at the Mo’ today, ok a lit­tle early, but I was over it. It stripped that thing off like it was never there. I even tried out one of my old Gilette razors in com­pe­ti­tion and gave up. The Azor sim­ply blitzed it. The Gilette had a brand new blade and the Azor one I’ve been using for two weeks. End of story as far as I am concerned.

Even bet­ter the boss of KoS has a blog and so too does the Azor Cam­paign Bat­tle Bus. Well blog­gers have to sup­port blog­gers so I will be using the Azor from now on.

Link to Full Article 9 comments

Labour challenges coalition compromise over climate deal

by Whaleoil November 28, 2008

Labour chal­lenges coali­tion com­pro­mise over cli­mate deal — Labour is cry­ing foul over a cli­mate change com­pro­mise reached between Act and National [TVNZ News Pol­i­tics]

Labour’s fat lit­tle pud­ding cli­mate change spokesman is all upset because a select com­mit­tee is going to be set up to look at the sci­ence of cli­mate change.

News­flash Charles baby! You lost, eat that!

I hope that the first per­son that the select com­mit­tee invites to tes­tify before it will be Vis­count Mon­ck­ton of Brench­ley. Then in no par­tic­u­lar order these fel­lows;

  • Dr Vin­cent Gray, of Welling­ton, an expert reviewer for the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Panel on Cli­mate Change (IPCC), most recently a vis­it­ing scholar at the Bei­jing Cli­mate Cen­tre in China.
  • Dr Ger­rit J. van der Lin­gen, of Christchurch, geologist/paleoclimatologist, cli­mate change con­sul­tant, for­mer direc­tor GRAINZ (Geo­science Research and Inves­ti­ga­tions New Zealand).
  • Pro­fes­sor Bob Carter, a New Zealand-trained geol­o­gist with exten­sive research expe­ri­ence in palaeo­cli­ma­tol­ogy, now at the Marine Geo­phys­i­cal Lab­o­ra­tory, James Cook Uni­ver­sity, Queens­land, Australia.
  • War­wick Hughes, a New Zealand earth sci­en­tist liv­ing in Perth, who con­ducts a com­pre­hen­sive web­site: www.warwickhughes.com
  • Roger Dewhurst, of Katikati, con­sult­ing envi­ron­men­tal geol­o­gist and hydrogeologist
  • Pro­fes­sor David J. Bel­lamy OBE an Eng­lish botanist, author, broad­caster and envi­ron­men­tal cam­paigner, who orig­i­nally trained as a botanist at Durham Uni­ver­sity, where he later held the post of senior lec­turer in botany until 1982, and still holds the post of Hon­orary Pro­fes­sor for Adult and Con­tin­u­ing Education.

They cer­tainly look like emi­nent peer-reviewed sci­en­tists that don’t believe the hype of the new reli­gion­ists. You see unlike the adher­ents of the new reli­gion of cli­mate sci­ence I sim­ply do not believe that there is any­where near a con­sen­sus that is claimed. A select com­mit­tee exam­in­ing ALL of the evi­dence is a fine thing to have hap­pen, then at least all sides get to pro­duce evi­dence and when I mean evi­dence I don’t mean imag­i­nary “evi­dence” like the “hockey stick”.

Link to Full Article 1 comment

More Idiot than Savant

by Whaleoil November 28, 2008

“Cap­i­tal­ism gone wild”, IS exhorts us to believe, with the reports that some­one died at a Wal-Mart due to shop­pers being crushed due to crowds.

A ter­ri­bly sad death and agreed that it was unnec­es­sary loss of life and Wal­mart failed in their crowd con­trol respon­si­bil­i­ties, but Mal­colm, uhh, Idiot/Savant then tells us:
“I’ve used the phrase “cap­i­tal­ism is red in tooth and claw”, but that’s sup­posed to refer to the aggre­gate social effects. This, OTOH, is sim­ply retail murder.”

Yeah, because peo­ple don’t die in com­mu­nist or tribal dic­ta­tor­ships queu­ing for food or sup­plies, do they? 


There seems to be a com­mon theme in these riots — less than demo­c­ra­tic nations, less than cap­i­tal­ist nations, com­mand economies. 

If Wal­mart failed to behave respon­si­bly in con­trol­ling crowds, man­ag­ing the oper­a­tions sci­ence of queues and pro­vid­ing a safe place for employ­ees, they will be pros­e­cuted by the state (and, more likely sued by the fam­ily of the deceased ). But a fail­ure of capitalism?
Link to Full Article

← Previous Entries