October 2008

She’s toast

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

Now this is fundrais­ing and out­side the square think­ing that I can support.

Go and bid hard and sup­port the Avon­head Ven­turer unit. The only prob­lem I can see is that they may have fallen foul of the Elec­toral Finance Act as the pic­ture may be con­sid­ered an elec­tion adver­tise­ment and isn’t authorised.

She's Toast

As usual the coments sec­tion is brilliant.

Toast Comments

Link to Full Article 6 comments

Daft statement of the campaign

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

National has a poofter for a leader.

Christ only knows what they think of Het­ero Helen.

 

Link to Full Article 2 comments

The Standard starts its tantrums

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

The Labour party lap-blog The Stan­dard starts its tantrums in the face of Labour’s impend­ing defeat.

They’re blam­ing the Her­ald for Labour’s polling, or rather, fail­ure to scru­ti­nise National’s policies.

A week out from the elec­tion, Granny Her­ald has still yet to do any proper cov­er­age of the effects on indi­vid­u­als and the econ­omy of National’s four flag­ship poli­cies: pri­vatis­ing ACC, gut­ting Kiwisaver, reduc­ing work rights, and weak­en­ing the RMA and ETS.”

Well, let’s look at it with­out blink­ers on.

- National isn’t pri­vatis­ing ACC. It’s intro­duc­ing com­pe­ti­tion, a com­pletely dif­fer­ent thing altogether.

- Kiwisaver. Of course, that’s rot as well. National is allow­ing peo­ple to reduce the amount they put in. That’s hardly gut­ting Kiwisaver, because peo­ple are still free to con­tribute more if they want to.

- Work­place law. National are giv­ing incen­tives to employ­ers to try staff. If some­one is fuck­ing up in their job in the first 90 days, it’s prob­a­bly s good thing for them to move on anyway.

- Reforms to the RMA and ditch­ing the ETS. Per­haps the appro­pri­ate response is hal­lelu­jah and about time!

In the end, Labour have only itself to blame for it’s media cov­er­age. It’s Elec­toral Finance Act, cou­pled with it’s appalling behav­iour and con­don­ing of appalling behav­iour, means that this elec­tion is being con­tested on the theme Labour wants, though for all the rea­sons Labour wouldn’t want.

This elec­tion is about trust, and the media don’t trust Labour First anymore.

Link to Full Article 2 comments

The DomPost Editorial is a pearler

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

Here is the Dom­Post Edi­to­r­ial today, the best bit is in bold;

At the Vic­to­rian Office of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions a swarthy, middle-aged man is hunched over a desk work­ing his way through an enor­mous stack of doc­u­ments, The Domin­ion Post writes

In Welling­ton a pile of doc­u­ments is dropped in a Domin­ion Post reporter’s let­ter­box wrapped in a copy of the Otago Daily Times. Fur­ther doc­u­ments fol­low, deliv­ered by some­one who calls him­self Batman.

The script for an antipodean John le Carre-style thriller? Sadly no.

Le Carre would have approved of “Bat­man”. It’s a nice touch, hint­ing at a sense of self-deprecation on the part of the doc­u­ment drop­per, but if Le Carre had been writ­ing the script, the man por­ing over court records in Mel­bourne would have been a Russ­ian emi­gre with a limp, not Labour Party pres­i­dent Mike Williams, and the drop would have been wrapped in the Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment, not the ODT.

Mr Williams’ inquiries and the mys­te­ri­ous let­ter­box drops were part of a much more pro­saic affair — an attempt to link for­mer cur­rency trader, and National Party leader, John Key to a noto­ri­ous cur­rency deal that landed 1980s share­mar­ket high-flier Allan Hawkins in jail. Mr Key once worked for the finance com­pany that han­dled the transaction.

Unfor­tu­nately for Labour’s appa­ratchiks, the sig­na­ture on the crit­i­cal doc­u­ment that got them excited was not his, but that of a for­mer Aus­tralian col­league who signed his name with a sim­i­lar flourish.

How­ever, two crit­i­cal facts have been uncov­ered by doc­u­ment searches in Mel­bourne. In an inter­view last year, Mr Key wrongly stated that he left Elders Mer­chant Finance a year ear­lier than he did in 1988 and he wrongly stated that he paid for a 1988 lunch that Aus­tralian court doc­u­ments show was actu­ally paid for by a colleague.

These are mat­ters of grave import that go to the heart of Mr Key’s cred­i­bil­ity as a prime min­is­te­r­ial aspirant.

If he can­not be relied upon to remem­ber who paid for the cham­pers with which he and his col­leagues toasted his depar­ture 20 years ago, how can he be trusted to run the coun­try? Next thing he’ll be claim­ing he was unaware the crown limo in which he was being fer­ried from one place to another was trav­el­ling at twice the speed limit, sign­ing his name to art­works he did not pro­duce, rewrit­ing elec­toral laws to suit his party or pre­tend­ing not to notice that a polit­i­cal ally has been mis­lead­ing the public.

But was it really nec­es­sary for Labour’s pres­i­dent to drop every­thing in the mid­dle of an elec­tion cam­paign and fly to Mel­bourne to pore over 20-year-old court records?

Labour had every right, and every rea­son, to check out a tip that Mr Key had behaved improp­erly in the past. If he had, it was legit­i­mate ammu­ni­tion to fire dur­ing the final days of the elec­tion cam­paign. But by reveal­ing its hand before it had the goods, the party has made itself look des­per­ate. It is a blun­der it can­not afford.

It is up against a cyn­i­cal oppo­nent who will stoop to any level to gain power. Instead of play­ing by the time-honoured rules of the game and smear­ing his oppo­nents as viciously as they smear him, Mr Key smiles beat­if­i­cally and steps dain­tily around the snares Labour lays in his path. It’s not cricket and it’s not pol­i­tics, but he’s got Labour rattled.

 

Link to Full Article 2 comments

Batman = Mike Williams

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

Mike Williams is Batman

The Her­ald today has outed Mike Williams as “Batman”.

On Octo­ber 13, an anony­mous blog­ger posted to Labour Party-affiliated web­site The Stan­dard. The blog­ger, call­ing him­self Bat­man, is believed to be a senior offi­cial, most likely party pres­i­dent Mike Williams, although he has denied it was him.

Bat­man” alleged that he had uncov­ered a story of “lies, con­spir­acy, fraud, theft, and a truly good cover up that has stood the test of time — until now.” The blog recounted Key’s firm denial of involve­ment in the H-Fee when he gave an inter­view with the Herald’s press gallery last year. It also accused the Her­ald of fail­ing to dig deeper when it reported on the issue again this year. “Eugene Bingham’s dig­ging has been with a tea­spoon,” wrote Bat­man. “Either Granny Herald’s huge polit­i­cal staff is asleep at the wheel, or this watch­dog has turned into a blue-rinsed poo­dle. Bat­man char­i­ta­bly favours the for­mer explanation.”

The Stan­dard and all the lit­tle “Robins” to Mike Williams Bat­man are thor­oughly discredited.

The funny thing is though that a Mike Williams was actu­ally involved in Bat­man the ani­mated TV series.

 

Link to Full Article 2 comments

Graft, Corruption and Winston

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

Win­ston Ray­mond Peters, 63, List MP of no fixed abode and proven liar, crook and cor­rupt politi­cian is once again the head­lines and for all the wrong reasons.

Remem­ber my post about the $3 bil­lion tax-avoiders who just so hap­pened to be Winston’s mates involved in the set­ting up of the “Couch Trust”. Now look at what one of the tran­scripts pro­vided to Phil Kitchin says;

Some doc­u­ments have par­lia­men­tary let­ter­heads and include notes from a meet­ing at which Mr Peters said he had saved Vela inter­ests “mil­lions in tax liability”.

Mmmmm…not that is a happy coin­ci­dence isn’t it.

Phil Kitchin has plenty more though, that fully exposes WRP, 63, LMPONFAAPL as the cor­rupt, venal wanker that he is.

There is no way he can weasel out this one. The doc­u­ments are irrefutable. Not only did Win­ston demand cash for pol­icy he also wanted a heli­copter to swan around in.

At the very least he could claim that the heli­copter was to pro­vide a breeze to stop his exces­sive sweat­ing. Win­ston, today will be sweat­ing like a rapist with these lat­est alle­ga­tions of graft.

Helen would have spat her corn­flakes and over-milked tea across the table at Peter after read­ing these alle­ga­tions. Helen Clark is don­key deep in this because of her con­stant defence of Win­ston and also by enabling the laws and pol­icy con­ces­sions bought and paid for by Vela interests.

Link to Full Article 6 comments

A face to haunt houses

by Whaleoil October 31, 2008

Helen Clark can haunt houses

It’s offi­cial!

Helen Clark has the most hor­rific face accord­ing to an online Her­ald survey.

Truly a face to haunt houses.

Per­haps that is why Labour have dropped the old crones face from their “Trust” TV ads.

Remem­ber this elec­tion is all about Trust.

Trust helen to cur­dle moth­ers milk, trust Helen Clark to lie like a flat­fish and trust Helen Clark to scare small children.

Link to Full Article

Where’s the Money Peter?

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Peter Dunne is yet to pay back the money his party nicked at the last elec­tion. He is now just days away from keep­ing his Rev­enue minister’s role and sod hasn’t yet paid us back.

If John Key’s min­istry is to have any integrity at all then surely he would be insist­ing that Peter Dunne or United Furure pay back their money before he will issue any min­is­te­r­ial warrant.

As for Win­ston Ray­mond Peters, 63 list MP of no fixed abode and proven liar, he still hasn’t paid any­thing. The prick should be behind bars.

Link to Full Article 5 comments

EFA silences debate">EFA silences debate

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Claire Trevett has a use­ful arti­cle about the chill­ing effect of the Elec­toral Finance Act on polit­i­cal discourse.

This law thank­fully will be gone in just a few weeks.

Labour has under­es­ti­mated how detested this act has been, they thought they could get away with this egre­gious assault on free­dom of speech and they were so, so wrong.

make the bas­tards pay Nov. 8

Link to Full Article

A better video

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

This is much bet­ter footage, it has longer, includ­ing slow motion replay!!! Also doesn’t have talk­ing over the top so you can hear the slap on the ground.

 

Link to Full Article 8 comments

Time for some Questions

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Helen Clark says;

I think the ques­tion about the past of any poten­tial prime min­is­ter is worth ask­ing. I think it is per­fectly fair to look at a person’s past and what they have done.”

I can think of a few ques­tions I would like to ask her but in the inter­ests of pub­lic ser­vice I will allow com­menters to ask the ques­tions in the com­ments sec­tion. Fill yer boots.

UPDATE: I have been emailed a list of questions;

  1. 1. Were you tears on your wed­ding day tears of hap­pi­ness or sadness?
  2. What do you think your con­tin­ued crime through theft of tax payer funds and note this as your role as “Prime Minister”?
  3. As Min­is­ter for Arts, can you please com­ment on your paint­ing fraud?
  4. Would you expect a cit­i­zen to get arrested for dri­ving at 160km/hr?
  5. On anti-smacking and your views that ‘it would defy human nature’ — can you please talk us through that?
  6. Do you acknowl­edge that the ETS is your design to crip­ple the business?
  7. Is your true vision and plan for NZ rep­re­sents that of a true Com­mu­nist State
  8. Do you believe you are Corrupt?
  9. Do you still want to kill kittens?
  10. Why do you “hate” business?
  11. Why do you “hate” the tra­di­tional con­cept of mar­riage and “detest” families?
  12. Why do you “hate” religion?
  13. How (psy­cho­log­i­cally) do you oddly blame the National gov­ern­ment of the 90’s for your own total fail­ures over the last 9 years?
  14. What do you feel of Michael Cullen round­ing up opin­ion and sup­port for your demise behind your back?
  15. Do you feel that you’ve cleaned up crime and cor­rup­tion in the polit­i­cal sys­tem (as claimed in 1990’s)?
  16. Do you still think “the role of gov­ern­ment is what gov­ern­ment (you) define it to be”?
  17. Do you still detest the Maori?
  18. Do you still “hate” Mid­dle class NZ?
  19. What will you do when you are kicked out? (see point 15)
  20. Why do you wish to see the SFO abol­ished? Should we ask Win­ston? ;-)
  21. Why did you spit on War Veterans?
  22. Have you enrolled your­self, three times, on the elec­toral roll this year?
  23. Do you have any­more Helen Clark not Helen Clark paintings?
  24. Do you still think you are a pop­u­lar and com­pe­tent Primer Minister?
  25. Who is the “woman” on the billboards?
  26. Why did you com­man­deer air force planes…to fly around the country…putting emis­sions into the atmosphere.…when rush­ing the Emis­sions Trad­ing Scam through?
  27. Why have you instructed the PSA to call fam­i­lies, over the phone…threaten and intim­i­date them into vot­ing Labour.…
  28. Are you aware that it is ille­gal to con­tact peo­ple who have supressed their con­tact details…?
  29. Are you aware that is not good to BULLY PEOPLE OVER THE PHONE INTO VOTING FOR YOU?
  30. Do you still think the US are spy­ing on you. News flash Clark…they prob­a­bly are!.…
  31. With all of that — do you really think peo­ple should “TRUST” a cor­rupt Helen Clark mis­led Government?
Link to Full Article 12 comments

Bob Harvey, just as mental as Andrew Williams

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Bob Har­vey decided to have a wee tantrum (described as an embar­rass­ing row) at an Envi­ron­men­tal Soci­ety meet­ing over National’s posi­tion on the Helensville hous­ing project. Turns out that Har­vey got it wrong and National and Har­vey were in close align­ment after all, but Har­vey didn’t realise!

Unfor­tu­nately for Mr Har­vey, the NBR reported Mr Har­vey was stone cold sober.

Maybe Mayor Bob should have just sent an angry late night email to Nick Smith instead. The National Party is quite used to get­ting them from some May­ors now.

Time for an Auck­land Region “rule” in some Out­look folders

What would such an email rule look like? I’ve had a go below

>If Con­di­tion “Sender” = “Unnamed angry Auck­land Mayor”, mark email as JUNK

ELSE

>If Con­di­tion “Sender” = “Unnamed angry Auck­land Mayor”, AND, IF Con­di­tion “Time” > 11:00pm and < 4:00am, mark email as DRUNK

THEN For­ward onto “National Auck­land Caucus”

 

Link to Full Article

Down she goes

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Like her party’s flag­ging poll rat­ings Helen Clark does a face plant.

 

Link to Full Article

Clarks changes story, someone is lying

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Helen Clark has now con­firmed that Labour paid for Mike Williams’ muck rak­ing trip to Aus­tralia. This despite claim­ing oth­er­wise yesterday.

Clark is clearly not in con­trol of her party any­more and has to resort to lying and then cor­rect­ing to try to cover for the spec­tac­u­lar deba­cle that she and mike Williams have landed on Labour.

Caught out like a pos­sum in the head­lights she lies like a flat­fish. We also find out that Labour hired an Aus­tralian Labor party lawyer to get a court order to release the 24kgs of doc­u­ments that Mike Williams brought back with him.

In this time of eco­nomic cri­sis Labour seems to be focussed on the past, Viet­nam, Spring­bok Tour, iraq and now some obscure finan­cial deal­ing 20 years ago. They are vision­less, venal, cor­rupt and unfit to gov­ern any longer.

Link to Full Article 1 comment

Jim’s Zone-Out Diet

by Whaleoil October 30, 2008

Jim Ander­ton has been caught on cam­era at Nel­son air­port scoff­ing down a huge chunk of cake. Clearly he isn’t prac­tis­ing what he preaches, either that or this is the new Jim’s Zone-Out Diet. Or per­haps he is a sub­scriber to the Marie Antoinette school of thought.

Jim's Zone Out Diet

Link to Full Article 3 comments