If DPF can do a post on Youtube, hard­core pornog­ra­phy, PornoTube, YouPorn, child pornog­ra­phy, black­list­ing and Clean­Feed then I can shame­lessly increase my Google Rank­ings by post­ing this image of Sweet Mus­lim Pussy.

Oh come on! What were you expecting?

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Labour has selected their new Botany can­di­date to replace dis­graced can­di­date Bren­den Shee­han who infa­mously threat­ened to come around with the rather rotund Muliaga boys and give Wha­le­oil the bash.

Despite the threats I asked Bren­den Shee­han to step in the ring with me and he failed to do so despite the offer a $1000 and a schol­ar­ship for the lard-asses. He still has failed to front though he does lurk around here from time to tme. There is still time Bren­den, 22 days to be precise.

Any­way I digress. There must be some­thing unique about Labour imports from Man­gere because they have selected another Man­gere res­i­dent to cam­paign in Botany. At least this one doesn’t live over the back of a cemetery.

And he is just what we need in par­lia­ment too! Another bloody academic.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Tut, tut over Tui’s take on Peters – A Tui bill­board say­ing “When Win­ston says no, he means no – Yeah, right” has brought a warn­ing that it may breach the Elec­toral Finance Act.
The bill­board is in the Tau­ranga elec­torate Win­ston Peters is des­per­ate to win, and the… [NZ Pol­i­tics]

How ridicu­lous is an Act that reg­u­lates satire?

Very ridicu­lous is what it is. Tui is get­ting a let­ter from the Elec­toral Com­mis­sion about its bill­boards, there’s six of them now. about Win­ston Ray­mond Peeters and his def­ni­tion of no.

Good to see the MSM catch­ing up with the blo­gos­phere. WOBH revealed the bill­boards on Tues­day and today is Fri­day so a good three days before the MSM.

This is yet another of the ever grow­ing list of pre­dic­tions that DPF, John Boscawen and I raised when oppos­ing the EFA. Every sin­gle pre­dic­tion has come true. The law is an ass, and a knack­ered ass at that.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

Iti hongi puts Cullen in a tricky spot – It was a Catch-22 for Treaty Nego­ti­a­tions Min­is­ter Michael Cullen as he looked down the line of Tuhoe wait­ing to greet him with hongi.
Among those lin­ing up was Tame Iti – a man fac­ing firearms charges who has pre­vi­ously shown… [NZ Pol­i­tics]

Oh excuse me while I just laugh my ass off.

Five months ago Cullen and Mal­lard and Ginga Boy and the Labour funded mouth­piece.

DPF points out the sheer, utter hypocrisy of the losers of the left.

The ribs are hurt­ing and it isn’t from training.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

hat tip No Min­is­ter. I can see two ver­sions, the Win­ston ver­sion and the Helen ver­sion. I feel inspired. If some­one would like to send me a script I’ll make them this weekend.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

Has the mys­te­ri­ous Karen Fuchs been outed unwit­tingly by Win­ston Ray­mond Peters? Check out this very inter­est­ing exchange from the House.

Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS: Because the mem­ber decided to descend to that level, I will tell the House what is not being hon­est and transparent-anywhere in the world, in fact. At a recent par­lia­men­tary func­tion, an MP pre­tended that a woman friend was his new girl­friend, intro­duced her to the press gallery as such, and also intro­duced that same per­son in a Koru lounge as such, when he knew, demon­stra­bly and pal­pa­bly, that that infor­ma­tion was not cor­rect.
Hon Mem­bers: Who’s your girl­friend, Rod­ney!
Rod­ney Hide: Madam Speaker-[Interruption] Point of order, Madam Speaker.
Madam SPEAKER: Point of order, Rod­ney Hide.
Rod­ney Hide: It was not you, Madam Speaker!
Madam SPEAKER: That com­ment was uncalled for; every­one knows I have taste and style.
Rod­ney Hide: I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. I know that, Madam Speaker, and I know that my style is not yours.
Madam SPEAKER: What is your point of order, please? Then Gerry Brown­lee, point of order.
Gerry Brown­lee: I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. Enter­tain­ing as that com­men­tary from Mr Peters might have been-it almost rivalled the Alice in Won­der­land story-he has no min­is­te­r­ial respon­si­bil­ity for that sort of thing. So could we get an answer from him, and could he address the ques­tion that was asked?
Madam SPEAKER: No. Please be seated. I have valiantly tried to define min­is­te­r­ial respon­si­bil­ity, but the ques­tions were tech­ni­cally within the con­text of the Pacific region, so they were, in fact, answered.
Hon Dr Nick Smith: So that’s the answer-to say that?
Madam SPEAKER: No, do not be ridicu­lous.
Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS: I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. I am, after all, the Min­is­ter of For­eign Affairs, and I have just explained a very for­eign affair that is going on right under the nose of the press gallery–
Madam SPEAKER: That is not sen­si­ble. Look, we are com­ing close to bring­ing this House into dis­re­pute, so would mem­bers please calm down.
Rod­ney Hide: Point of order–
Madam SPEAKER: If it is not a point of order, the mem­ber will have a very short stay in this House.
Rod­ney Hide: I think I might sit down at this junc­ture, Madam Speaker.
Madam SPEAKER: Right!

So Win­ston even knows about the lovely Karen!!. And here was me think­ing that Rod­ney had suc­cess­fully man­aged to keep this all quiet.

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

Some bad news out there folks. Appar­ently Obe­sity can be contagious.

This is truly going to be dev­as­tat­ing news for Ricardo and any other per­son in close prox­im­ity to Pork Chop aka Glau­coma aka Rachel Glucina.

Good lord! Watch out for those nasty side effects when you hit the Xeni­cal. The peo­ple sho own the couch still haven’t got the stain out apparently.

Of course those fat­ties out there look­ing for an excuse for youe plus, plus size can always blame some­one else now. “Oh, I caught Obe­sity from her”

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Yes­ter­day while Win­ston Ray­mond Peters was dream­ing abour Alice in Won­der­land and attack­ing every one he could think of he used a rather sad per­sonal sit­u­a­tion of a for­mer staffer to try to smear him. As he was doing that Ron Mark, the “Min­nie Win­nie” of par­lia­ment was heard to call out “pae­dophile”.

Would that be the same Ron Stan­ley Mark who has a con­vic­tion for unlaw­ful sex­ual con­nec­tion with a 15 year old?

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

What is Andrew Williams, the North Shore Mayor’s favourite after hours activity?

Is Andrew Williams a teetotaller?

Hasn’t Rodney’s Jacket just been a spec­tac­u­lar success?

Just who is brows­ing WOBH from Anguilla of all places?

Should I join ACT and be done with it?

Why won’t a soft cock lefty get in the ring with me on 23/08/2008?

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

More unde­clared dona­tions have sur­faced as the polit­i­cal death of Win­ston Ray­mond Peters by a thou­sand cuts con­tin­ues with Phil Kitchin deliv­er­ing another cut.

Though not fatal the cuts received thus far are drain­ing the life blood from the car­cass of Win­ston First.

Today’s install­ment is a $20,000 deposit to the party’s bank account that does not appear on its reg­is­ter of declared donations.

The Domin­ion Post has obtained a deposit slip show­ing $19,998 was deposited in one or more cheques into the party’s cof­fers in Decem­ber 1999.

Phil Kitchin has also released the tran­script a very short phone con­ver­sa­tion with Win­ston Ray­mond Peters where Win­ston says “Phil, I told you I’m not talk­ing to a lying wanker like you. See you.” before hang­ing up.

Unfor­tu­nately for Win­ston we all know who the “lying wanker” is and it isn’t Phil Kitchin. One won­ders how long Clark can sus­tain Winston’s bullshit?

Pop­u­lar­ity: 1% [?]

John Arm­strong: The Great Sur­vivor goes hunt­ing for brain­less meerkats – The last refuge of a politi­cian in seri­ous trou­ble is to blame the media. Not so in Win­ston Peters’ case. Blam­ing the media is not suf­fi­cient. When Peters strikes prob­lems, they are deemed the prod­uct of a vast media con­spir­acy against… [NZ Pol­i­tics]

John Arm­strong out­line 4 fac­tors behind the refusal of Win­ston Ray­mond Peters to hold him­self to the same stan­dards he demands of others.

1. Any expla­na­tion of exactly what hap­pened to Sir Robert Jones’ $25,000 dona­tion to the party risks high­light­ing the fic­tion that NZ First is morally supe­rior to other par­ties and does not accept money from big busi­ness inter­ests or delib­er­ately hide such donations.

2. Offer­ing some insight into what hap­pened to Sir Robert’s dona­tion would only invite more scrutiny just when the story appears to be (slowly) run­ning out of steam.

3. The reluc­tance of all par­ties to open their finan­cial books for inspec­tion. The only one which reg­u­larly pub­lishes its accounts in any detail is Labour.

4. Win­ston Peters is Win­ston Peters. He does not come in safe, diluted ver­sions. When you buy the pack­age – as Labour has dis­cov­ered late in the par­lia­men­tary term – you get the full package.

Heh, Win­ston Ray­mond Peters cer­tainly is a poi­soned chal­ice. Only one thing is for cer­tain when you get into bed with Win­ston, he’s going to shag ya in the chook and you are sleep­ing in the wet spot with a sore arse.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Nats sus­pect Govt offices broke law – National deputy leader Bill Eng­lish says gov­ern­ment depart­ments may have effec­tively been breach­ing elec­toral laws for seven months by using the term “Labour-led Gov­ern­ment” on their web­sites.
Mr Eng­lish yes­ter­day released advice… [NZ Pol­i­tics]

The Labour-led theft of pub­lic monies con­tin­ues unabated. Not only that the Gov­ern­ment has breached the Elec­toral Finance Act 13,600 times on gov­ern­ment website!

Why does Labour find it so hard to fol­low the law?

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Garth George : I’m sick of nanny state and MMP – Back in Decem­ber last year I pre­dicted to a gath­er­ing of Her­ald colum­nists that National would win this year’s elec­tion by a land­slide suf­fi­cient to allow it to gov­ern alone.
Noth­ing has hap­pened since to make me regret that pre­dic­tion…. [NZ Pol­i­tics]

Another very good cur­mud­geonly arti­cle by Garth George on why he hates MMP. He mostly hates MMP because of one “tire­some and tur­bu­lent lit­tle man”. He is of course talk­ing about Win­ston Ray­mond Peters.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Here is a lit­tle reminder of Win­ston Ray­mond Peters a few years back. Per­haps some of the MSM might go back to Bill Hodge for some addi­tional com­ments on Win­ston Ray­mond Peters.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]

Since Win­ston Ray­mond Peters the for­mer mem­ber for Tau­ranga is in the news alot I think it is timely to announce that Simon Bridges has launched his online cam­paign with both a Face­book pro­file and his new website.

So far in the cam­paign Win­ston Ray­mond Peters has worked very hard to win Tauranga……for Simon.

Look at this nice photo of Simon hav­ing his ears bent by some old dears. I ask you who’d really want to be an MP?

And in a lit­tle touch of irony since Simon is tak­ing on Win­ston Ray­mond Peters I note that Aaron Bhat­na­gar has helped out Simon with the site. Actu­ally that is bloody funny.

Pop­u­lar­ity: unranked [?]