February 2006

Benson-Pope telling the truth

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

Benson-Pope telling the truth

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

Benson-Pope telling the truth

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

David Benson-Pinocchio

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

…oh shit there it goes again

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

 

.…and fur­ther Madam Speaker, I can­not recall.….oh shit there it goes again, last week it was Helens nose and now my nose is start­ing to grow.….

David Benson-Pinocchio
David Benson-Pinocchio


 

 

 

Link to Full Article

1998incident1c

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

1998incident1c

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

1998incident1c

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

DBP">1998 DBP

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Related Posts:No Related Posts

Link to Full Article

Awww…this is starting to hurt

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

From Inves­ti­gate mag­a­zine.

 This is from 1998, one year after the “for­got­ten” incident.

1998 DBP
 

 

Link to Full Article

Pot, Kettle, Black Hodgson

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

Pete “the Fist” Hodg­son has come out say­ing that National want to “buy” elec­tions because of their com­ments over the polit­i­cal advertising.

Pot, Ket­tle, black Minister.

Labour tried and indeed suc­ceeded in buy­ing the last elec­tion. The only dif­fer­ence between National and Labour is National used their own money and Labour used mine and every other taxpayers.

Link to Full Article

Union hacks line up behind Minister

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

The union hacks are now lin­ing up behind Benson-Pope with one of them being Richard Good.


Richard Good, the PPTA’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive for Otago and South­land says the union is usu­ally involved in every step of the com­plaint process but he has never been advised of a seri­ous parental com­plaint against Mr Benson-Pope.

Mr Good says he has been in the job 19 years and has records of all his deal­ings with Bay­field High School, but nei­ther the for­mer prin­ci­pal Bruce Lead­bet­ter nor Mr Benson-Pope ever advised him of a seri­ous com­plaint from a parent.


Not sur­pris­ing at all Mr Good since David Benson-Pope was in your posi­tion imme­di­ately prior to you and you are now his Elec­torate Chair­man. Fur­ther David benson-Pope was the union rep at Bayfield.

My expe­ri­ence of Unions involved in seri­ous alle­ga­tions of this sort is for them to arrange a glow­ing ref­er­ence for the teacher con­cerned then help them get a trans­fer else­where based on the glow­ing reference.

Link to Full Article 4 comments

Why do we bother to have courts?

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

After spend­ing over $1 mil­lion in tak­ing the issues before the Envi­ron­ment Court and after hav­ing the Court give its go ahead, the Gov­ern­ment is set to “veto” the pro­posal to build a marina at Whangamata.

Why?

Who knows. Envi­ron­men­tal pique?, Maori lob­by­ing? No one but the min­is­ter knows.

If rumours are indeed true and the Min­is­ter is about to veto the pro­posal it begs the ques­tion, What pur­pose does the Court have? Why would Kiwis waste their time going through the court process, it would be bet­ter to cross a Min­is­ters palm with sil­ver to get results.

Link to Full Article

Hey Cullen, looks like he isn’t “confused”

by Whaleoil February 28, 2006

For­mer Prin­ci­pal Bruce Lead­bet­ter has found his spine and hit back at DBP and also at Cullen.


For­mer Bay­field High School head Bruce Lead­bet­ter last night reaf­firmed that he had told Mr Benson-Pope about a com­plaint over him enter­ing the female bath­room, where two girls were show­er­ing, and a girls dor­mi­tory, where girls were dress­ing, at a school camp in 1997. 


DBP con­tin­ues to deny he did any­thing wrong.….and he doesn’t recall the incident.

Well let me tell you as some­one who has been sub­ject to an inves­ti­ga­tion into ones actions, you don’t fuck­ing for­get it.

I still remem­ber the inquiry, the embar­ras­ment, the feel­ing of hope­less­ness of the sit­u­a­tion. Even­tu­ally when you are cleared as I was you still feel put through the ringer, and let me tell you, I remem­ber every detail of it like it was yesterday.….and yes Prime min­is­ter I can remem­ber it (with amaz­ing clar­ity) even though it was 8 years ago.

Just so the innu­endo and ques­tions do not build about me, I was accused of kick­ing a 14 year old Scout on the back­side at a Scout Jam­boree. I was reported by a third party, still unknown to me who was more than 100 metres from the “inci­dent” and despite the sup­port of sev­eral other lead­ers and scouts who were within  10m I was still put through the ringer.

Fair enough, appear­ances are every­thing and I put myself in what appeared to be an inap­pro­pri­ate sit­u­a­tion, but the point I make is that you don’t for­get, not ever. Fur­ther my sit­u­a­tion pales into insignif­i­cance com­pared to DBP’s long list of proven and alleged crimes of assault, bul­ly­ing and lying. Fur­ther I know of one other blog­ger who can tes­tify to the abil­ity to remem­ber past inves­ti­ga­tions that occured some­time into the past about inap­pro­pri­ate behaviour.

Any­way back to Mr Lead­bet­ter and whether he was “con­fused” as alleged by Cullen, who by all accounts is becom­ing increas­ingly con­fused him­self arouns th halls of parliament.

Link to Full Article

Looks like they are going to tough it out

by Whaleoil February 27, 2006

Looks like they are going to tough it out. They have even rolled out the Poo­dle to help.

Inves­ti­gate mag­a­zine has lit­tle choice now but to pub­lish more, or as the Prime Min­is­ter put it “put up or shut up”

Well looks like the “put up” option is going to be taken with rev­e­la­tions that David Benson-Pope kneed a boy in the groin.

Inves­ti­gate has also sug­gested pos­si­ble Crimes Act breaches DBP and his supporters. 


S107. Con­tra­ven­tion of Statute, which car­ries a pos­si­ble one year jail term. It is alleged Benson-Pope is liable under this sec­tion because in smack­ing a girl’s thigh with a ruler, he breached s139A of the Edu­ca­tion Act 1989, which banned cor­po­ral pun­ish­ment in schools.

S195. Cru­elty to child, which car­ries a pos­si­ble jail term of five years for “any­one who – hav­ing cus­tody, con­trol or charge of a child under 16 wil­fully ill-treats…or will­fully causes or per­mits the child to be ill-treated, in a man­ner likely to cause him unnec­es­sary suf­fer­ing, actual bod­ily harm, injury to health, or any men­tal dis­or­der or dis­abil­ity”.
Inves­ti­gate alleges this clause would cover both the direct phys­i­cal assault on a school­girl, but poten­tially any phys­i­cal or men­tal harm caused to other stu­dents by David Benson-Pope as well.

S196. Com­mon Assault. Every­one is liable to impris­on­ment for a term not exceed­ing one year who assaults any other person.

S209. Kid­nap­ping. This sec­tion was con­sid­ered applic­a­ble in the ear­lier inves­ti­ga­tion of David Benson-Pope, because it doesn’t just cover abduc­tion, but also detain­ing a per­son with­out her con­sent or with con­sent obtained by duress. In the case of girls trapped in the show­ers because Benson-Pope was allegedly stand­ing right out­side their cubi­cles, the kid­nap­ping sec­tion could apply although the scale of offend­ing would be at the low­est end of a pun­ish­ment scale of up to 14 years’ jail.

Link to Full Article