November 2005

Axe the Tax

by Whaleoil November 30, 2005

National has launched a cam­paign to axe the car­bon tax, includ­ing a ded­i­cated web­site.

Mean­while there is some endorse­ment from sone supris­ing sec­tors ;)   

Greens, Jeanette Fitzsi­mons: “If you want to see more big trucks on the road and less use of rail, this is the cam­paign for you,” she said. 

Well Jeanette, fine exam­ple but unfor­tu­nately there is lit­tle option to move any­thing to the provinces from almost any­where with­out invov­ing trucks, so get a life you silly bint. 

Cullen was typ­i­cally snide and sar­cas­tic with his “Ho Hum” state­ment. The arro­gance of the man knows no bounds. 

Link to Full Article

Lieberman says stay

by Whaleoil November 29, 2005

Sen­a­tor Joe Lieber­man, yes a Demo­c­rat has come out in the press say­ing “Amer­ica can’t aban­don 27 mil­lion Iraqis to 10,000 terrorists.”

I am with him on this one and what is very inter­est­ing is that this is a Demo­c­rat say­ing this, in fact, he is one of the first to aban­don par­ti­san pol­i­tics and get in behind fin­ish­ing a job started.

“the Iraqi peo­ple are in reach of a water­shed trans­for­ma­tion from the prim­i­tive, killing tyranny of Sad­dam to mod­ern, self-governing, self-securing nationhood–unless the great Amer­i­can mil­i­tary that has given them and us this unex­pected oppor­tu­nity is pre­ma­turely withdrawn.”

It is a war between 27 mil­lion and 10,000; 27 mil­lion Iraqis who want to live lives of free­dom, oppor­tu­nity and pros­per­ity and roughly 10,000 ter­ror­ists who are either Sad­dam revan­chists, Iraqi Islamic extrem­ists or al Qaeda for­eign fight­ers who know their wretched causes will be set back if Iraq becomes free and modern.

In my meet­ing with the thought­ful prime min­is­ter of Iraq, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, he declared with jus­ti­fi­able pride that his coun­try now has the most open, demo­c­ra­tic polit­i­cal sys­tem in the Arab world. He is right.

In a plea for san­ity he bags wowser Democ­rats and worry-wart Repub­li­cans equally.

I am dis­ap­pointed by Democ­rats who are more focused on how Pres­i­dent Bush took Amer­ica into the war in Iraq almost three years ago, and by Repub­li­cans who are more wor­ried about whether the war will bring them down in next November’s elec­tions, than they are con­cerned about how we con­tinue the progress in Iraq in the months and years ahead. 

Link to Full Article

Benson-Pope missing in action

by Whaleoil November 29, 2005

Benson-Pope has announced he is unavail­able for ques­tions at the Social Ser­vices Select Com­mit­tee next Wednes­day, appar­ently with no excuse proffered.

Judith Collins is after the way­ward min­is­ter with aven­gence.

 “I am dis­ap­pointed that Mr Benson-Pope is not pre­pared to front up and answer ques­tions about a big-spending Min­istry that con­sumes a large chunk of gov­ern­ment revenue.

 “Finan­cial reviews are extremely impor­tant and if this Min­is­ter isn’t pre­pared to be account­able then he should move aside for some­one who is.”

 Mr Benson-Pope’s fail­ure to attend next week’s select com­mit­tee fol­lows on from his no-show in Par­lia­ment last week to answer ques­tions about a police report into his­toric assault allegations.

 “Mr Benson-Pope should be tak­ing this oppor­tu­nity to show the pub­lic that he is back in the sad­dle and earn­ing his min­is­te­r­ial salary. Unfor­tu­nately, he has missed his oppor­tu­nity,” says Ms Collins.

Benson-Pope is a lame-duck min­is­ter, and this gov­ern­ment is fast liv­ing up to expec­ta­tions that it would fall into farce.

Link to Full Article

Karl du Fresne lines up Peters

by Whaleoil November 29, 2005

Karl du Fresne has joined the grow­ing list of jour­nal­ists and com­men­ta­tors that are lin­ing up Peters for his fall. They will all be will­ing helpers in mak­ing sure he fails again in gov­ern­ment, although I am nor sure how they will be able to pro­tect Aunty Helen for the shit that splat­ters when it all turn sour.

Any­way here are the money lines from his comentary. 

The prob­lem is, Mr Peters is just not genet­i­cally pro­grammed to be in government

At the moment his weapons sys­tem is con­fused because its nor­mal tar­get – the Gov­ern­ment – has been placed off-limits. That’s why his range-finder has locked on to the media, its nat­ural default set­ting. For their part, the media have sniffed blood and are cir­cling like sharks. How else could you explain the pres­ence of so many New Zealand reporters in Malta for an event as stu­pe­fy­ingly bor­ing as Chogm?

The sooner Helen Clark pulls the plug on this unnat­ural exper­i­ment, the more we will be spared embar­rass­ment. And Mr Peters – who I note has adopted the alarm­ing habit of refer­ring to him­self in the third per­son – will be relieved of the humil­i­a­tion of hav­ing to pre­tend he’s some­thing he isn’t.

Link to Full Article

I’d like tea please and make it snappy.

by Whaleoil November 29, 2005

Link to Full Article

Cullen closes loophole that had no “significant impact”

by Whaleoil November 29, 2005

Cullen has announced today that he will pass changes to the leg­is­la­tion imple­ment­ing the loans pol­icy, despite him telling the house that, “No, I do not think there will be any sig­nif­i­cant impact in that respect”.

The changes will: 

  • Ensure that refunds relat­ing to the 2004–2005 and 2005–2006 tax years remain sub­ject to interest.
  • Pre­vent refunds being claimed for pre­vi­ous years unless the claims have already been lodged.
  • Remove the oppor­tu­nity to apply for spe­cial deduc­tion rates below the stan­dard 10 per cent rate for the bal­ance on the cur­rent tax year. 

One won­ders about other loop­holes out there await­ing clos­ing that have no “sig­nif­i­cant impact”. Not only has he closed the loop­hole he will do it ret­ro­spec­tively. Ret­ro­spec­tive leg­is­la­tion is in essence an admis­sion of poor pol­icy, leg­is­la­tion and planning.

Some ques­tions for parliament;

  1. Would the min­is­ter explain why if there was no “sig­inif­i­cant impact” he has closed the loophole.
  2. Why is the min­is­ter mak­ing the leg­is­la­tion ret­ro­spec­tive when he told the house on 23 Novem­ber 2005 that “I doubt they would be made ret­ro­spec­tive”.
  3. Given that the min­is­ter has said “I doubt they would be made ret­ro­spec­tive” on 23 Novem­ber 2005, could he please explain how he has not mis­lead the house in giv­ing that answer.

Why don’t these bozos just admit that the pol­icy is a crock and needs to be com­pletely dis­posed of or re-thought by some­one other than a failed his­tory teacher?

Link to Full Article

Council votes to appoint Maori representative

by Whaleoil November 28, 2005

We’ve blogged pre­vi­ously about the Manukau City Council’s deci­sion to cre­ate a Maori stand­ing com­mit­tee and the unde­mo­c­ra­tic nature of that decision.

Wait­akere City Coun­cil has just taken the next step for­ward by appoint­ing Maori mem­bers to their reg­u­lar stand­ing com­mit­tees with full vot­ing rights. This takes the cake so far and will see unelected peo­ple mak­ing deci­sion on behalf of res­i­dents and ratepay­ers in Wait­akere City.

At least with the Manukau model the maori com­mit­tee will only have pow­ers of rec­om­men­da­tion which will be scru­ti­nized by the full coun­cil meet­ing each month. But with with Wait­akere model, the appointed Maori mem­bers will have exactly the same rights as a full elected Councillor.

Both sys­tems adopted by the Coun­cils are com­pletely unde­mo­c­ra­tic and fly in the face of all prin­ci­ples of fair­ness and equal­ity. In New Zealand we have two classes of cit­i­zen­ship — one for Maori, and one for every­body else.

And guess which gov­ern­ment changed the Local Govt Act to allow this to happen!?

Link to Full Article

Proof Journos are lefties

by Whaleoil November 28, 2005

We always knew that jour­nal­ists we left­ies and sup­ported the Labour party.

We have fur­ther proof of this with Sub­ur­ban News­pa­pers Limited’s staff going on strike tomor­row. Being union mem­bers, they all help to sub­sidise the Labour Party which makes their bias towards the left all the more obvious.

Don’t for­get to smile when you drive past the SNL offices tomor­row morn­ing at 666 Gt South Rd, Penrose.

Link to Full Article

Are they fricken’ insane?

by Whaleoil November 28, 2005

Hat tip: LGF

Only Poms would do some­thing so fricken’ dumb.

A MASSIVE mosque that will hold 40,000 wor­ship­pers is being pro­posed beside the Olympic com­plex in Lon­don to be opened in time for the 2012 Games.

The project’s back­ers hope the mosque and its sur­round­ing build­ings would hold a total of 70,000 peo­ple, only 10,000 fewer than the Olympic sta­dium.
Its futur­is­tic design fea­tures wind tur­bines instead of the tra­di­tional minarets, while a translu­cent lat­ticed roof would replace the domes seen on most mosques. The com­plex is designed to become the “Mus­lim quar­ter” for the Games, act­ing as a hub for Islamic com­peti­tors and spectators.

More like a hub for bombers, ter­ror­ists and nut­ters. Oh well you reap what you sow.

At least the author­i­ties won’t have far to go.

Some com­men­tors at LGF had this to say;

Good to gather them all in one place.

Like #2 sez, a mosque for 40,000 and this lit­tle chromium switch here, …

Great place for a work accident.

Oh wow, just stick an army of ter­ror­ists right under the noses of the games. Rem­i­ne­scient
of the Ger­man 1972 games any­one?

Link to Full Article

Iranian President continues tirade

by Whaleoil November 28, 2005

From the Wash­ing­ton Times.

Irans nut­case Pres­i­dent is con­tin­u­ing to rail against the west and the US in par­tic­u­lar. This man is very dan­ger­ous, but he must also be really, really stupid.

Iran’s hard-line pres­i­dent said yes­ter­day the Bush admin­is­tra­tion should be tried on war-crimes charges, and he denounced the West for pres­sur­ing Iran to curb its con­tro­ver­sial nuclear program.

“You, who have used nuclear weapons against inno­cent peo­ple, who have used ura­nium ord­nance in Iraq, should be tried as war crim­i­nals in courts,” Pres­i­dent Mah­moud Ahmadine­jad said.

I mean draw­ing the ire of the most pow­er­ful nation in the world bar none and pok­ing a stick in their face.

Iran couldn’t defeat Sad­dam Hus­sein in 15 years of War. The US defeated the same army in less than 15 days. That same army is now bat­tle hard­ened and just across the border.

Iran con­tin­ues to defy the UN (I mean who doesn’t these days) over their nuclear pro­gram. Being told off by the UN is like being being gummed by a defanged, de clawed, geri­atric poodle.

It seems that the only nation capa­ble, will­ing and able to bring democ­racy to the world is the US.

What thanks do they get, zip, nada, zilch, only social­ist rant­i­ngs and muellings.

Link to Full Article

Looks like Working for [Other Peoples] Families is in trouble

by Whaleoil November 27, 2005

From the Her­ald this morn­ing we find that Work­ing for [Other Peo­ples] Fam­i­lies has hit a spot of bother.

No, not from the right but from the left.

The Gov­ern­ment has been forced into a court bat­tle to stop ben­e­fi­ciary fam­i­lies mak­ing claim to $3000 a year under the Work­ing for Fam­i­lies package.

In a land­mark case, the Child Poverty Action Group has won the right to take legal action over Gov­ern­ment poli­cies it says dis­crim­i­nate against the 250,000 New Zealand chil­dren who have at least one par­ent on a benefit. 

Typ­i­cal fuck­ing social­ists, not sat­is­fied with a bur­geon­ing wel­fare state they now want to extend the new state ben­e­fits of the mid­dle class work­ing to those already on benefits.In effect giv­ing them a ben­e­fit for not working.

Biz­zarely the Human Rights Review Tri­bunal ruled the group can legally chal­lenge the exclu­sion of ben­e­fi­cia­ries from a new pay­ment which gives fam­i­lies an extra $60 a week from April.  The Human Rights Act pro­hibits dis­crim­i­na­tion on the grounds of being a beneficiary.

Looks like Liar-bour has told another porky, this time about the cost of Work­ing for [Other Peo­ple] Families.

The new name for this pol­icy make well have to be “NOT Work­ing for Families”.

Link to Full Article

Gman lays out the case for contempt

by Whaleoil November 26, 2005

Gman has suc­cintly laid out the case for Par­lia­ment find­ing David “Ten­nis­ball” Benson-Pope guilty of Con­tempt of House.

Firstly though he edu­cates the buly-boy min­is­ter on the def­i­n­i­tion of prima facie which it seems that every­one except labour MP’s Mar­garet Wil­son and the min­is­ter him­self are aware of.

Just in case he hasn’t been advised of that here is the def­i­n­i­tion from the Oxford Dic­tio­nary of Law.

“A case that has been sup­ported by suf­fi­cient evi­dence for it to be taken as proved in the absence of ade­quate evi­dence to the con­trary”.

Oh and a lit­tle hint davey don’t call cops bozo’s they might just revisit your lit­tle out­stand­ing prima facie case of assault.

Any­way back to the charge from GMan.

  1. Benson-Pope was on Par­lia­ments grounds. [Evi­dence here]
  2. Ben­son Pope knew that he had a ques­tion for oral answer in Par­lia­ment. Min­is­ters are not just politely requested to answer ques­tions if they are in the par­lia­men­tary precincts, they are required to be there and to answer the question.
  3. Mr Ben­son Pope admits that this din­ner was not pre­arranged, but was held on the spur of the moment.
  4. Fool­ishly, he sub­se­quently seems to have not only admit­ted that he was on Par­lia­ment grounds, but seems to be pos­i­tively gloat­ing about it. [Evi­dence:
    “It (lunch) was a real neat expe­ri­ence, much bet­ter than being in the debat­ing cham­ber,” Mr Benson-Pope told Radio Dunedin.]

Thus GMan asserts by these actions Min­is­ter Benson-Pope has breached Stand­ing Order 399 and in par­tic­u­lar Stand­ing Order 400 para (a), ® and (s). I would also add (q).

Link to Full Article

Confused South African Speaks Out

by Whaleoil November 25, 2005

This blog has been fol­low­ing the debate over Maori rep­re­sen­ta­tion in Manukau City for sev­eral weeks. Now we see a new twist to the debate as a rather odd South African man enters the debate.

You would think that some­one who has lived in South Africa would despise any move that sep­a­rates two groups based on race. Not Mr Alan Phillips — the for­mer Cape Town City Coun­cil­lor, now liv­ing in New Zealand actu­ally sup­ports the Manukau City Council’s moves to give Maori spe­cial priv­i­leges by estab­lish­ing a Maori Stand­ing Committee:

“If you look at South Africa, there are stand­ing com­mit­tees to address the needs of the dis­ad­van­taged,” says Mr Phillips. “In other words, you’re giv­ing pref­er­en­tial treat­ment to peo­ple that have the same vote to raise their level, I’m sure the com­mit­tee will do the same for Maori.“In South Africa, the needs of black, coloured and Indian peo­ple are put ahead of white peo­ple. I’m not say­ing that’s right or wrong, but you need to raise the level of all South Africans in South Africa, just as you need to raise the level of New Zealan­ders in NZ.”

Mr Phillips is cer­tainly enti­tled to his view, but per­haps he should be open about his past as a Cape Town City Coun­cil­lor (1996–2000).

In the time that Mr Phillips claims he was a Coun­cil­lor, the munic­i­pal sub-council that he sat on decided to increase local gov­ern­ment rates in their area by an out­ra­geous 19% in one sin­gle year (1998)!

But not only did they hike the rates up by this much, because of the incom­pe­tence of the Coun­cil in for­get­ting to get the munuci­pal­ity reval­ued for 25years, the mas­sive increase impacted dis­pro­por­tion­ally on black home­own­ers in pre­vi­ously dis­ad­van­taged areas. The very peo­ple Mr Phillips now claims he strived to protect.

This case of dis­pro­por­tion­ally hik­ing the rates up on black com­mu­ni­ties was taken to the Cape Town High Court. In Lotus River, Ottery, Grassy Park Res­i­dents Asso­ci­a­tion v South Penin­sula Munic­i­pal­ity the court found that the way the sub-council rated the munic­i­pal­ity amounted to dis­crim­i­na­tion on the basis of colour.

Link to Full Article

UN Inspector, I’ve got a message for ya.">Hey!!! Mr UN Inspector, I’ve got a message for ya.

by Whaleoil November 25, 2005
The Bird
 

Link to Full Article

The Bird

by Whaleoil November 25, 2005

Link to Full Article

← Previous Entries